Continuity error / plot hole regarding Zoidberg?

Sep 17, 2003, 12:05 PM ET11 posts by 10 posters
11 posts
Tony Sivori

How can Zoidberg's father still be living if their species dies immediately after mating?

References: The one (sorry I don't know the title or episode numbers) when Zoidberg's father is a living but washed up silent film maker. Versus the one where Zoidberg gets the mating urge, travels to his home planet and escapes gruesome death only because no female would have him.

Tony Sivori
JimTony Sivori

Tony Sivori wrote in news:[email]:

That's Lobstertainment.

It's not Zoidberg's father, but his uncle, Harold Zoid.

Jim

Tom HawleyJim

Which explains how that character can exist, but not how his mother "sure you can be a doctor, if you've given up your dream of becoming a comedian" was around in his younger years.

The Digital DragonTom Hawley

The episode is A Taste Of Freedom and it's neer specified that's his mother.

That's not normal: normal is coming home to find your mother nailed to a cross screaming verses from the book of Mormon, your dad performing a dark ritual with your brother as the sacrifice, and your sister getting railed by a goat.
Steve VanDevenderDavid Litchman

David Litchman writes:

Of course he was. As we found out in "Why Must I Be a Crustacean in Love", members of Zoidberg's species die immediately after mating. So all those little Zoidbergs have to go through their incredibly complicated development ("Teenage Mutant Leela's Hurdles") with foster parents, if any at all.

Steve VanDevender "I ride the big iron" http://jcomm.uoregon.edu/~stevev [email] PGP keyprint 4AD7AF61F0B9DE87 522902969C0A7EE8 Little things break, circuitry burns / Time flies while my little world turns Every day comes, every day goes / 100 years and nobody shows -- Happy Rhodes
Duff ManTom Hawley

"Tom Hawley" wrote in message news:Sn3ab.1931$[email]...

A) I don't believe it was ever specified that it was his mother...

B) Zoidberg was probably adopted or lived in an orphanage...

LooseChanjDuff Man

On or about Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:49:44 -0500, Duff Man made the sensational claim that:

Well, then so did every other individual in his species. If you think about it, there would have to be a certain amount of people who didn't mate for the purpose of raising the children of those who did. At least, if you want to get any transfer of knowledge, which I would think would be essential to any advanced race.

This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | This space is for rent It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | Inquire within if you No person, none, care | and it will reach me | Would like your ad here
Ross PresserLooseChanj

LooseChanj wrote in news:fd5ab.2920$[email]:

Technically, not so; as long as the nannies spend a few years raising children BEFORE going off to mate, the speicies and its knowledge can survive and yet everyone can still mate.

Louis FungRoss Presser

Ross Presser wrote:

what if there was some sort of "genetic" memory that was passed down from generation to generation?

can you imagine that? a whole species with zoidberg's competancy in medicine? ;)

Louis :)

Tony SivoriJim

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:15:27 +0000, Jim wrote:

You're right. Never mind.

Tony Sivori