servers

Jun 1, 2003, 5:32 PM ET14 posts by 12 posters
14 posts
Albert the Mildly Deranged

Hey, just out of interest, who's using a computer program like Outlook Express to view this newsgroup? Cos If you're not, you can - I do...

RobAlbert the Mildly Deranged

if you havent been using a news reader... what have you been using???

"Albert the Mildly Deranged" wrote in message news:chuCa.769$[email]... > Hey, just out of interest, who's using a computer program like Outlook > Express to view this newsgroup? Cos If you're not, you can - I do...
Brion K. LienhartRob

"Rob" <.> wrote in message news:[email]...

Personally, I pick it up on the fillings in my teeth. I have to chew on tinfoil to send messages.

Chris ®David Matthew Wood

I can't seem to configure it to read newsgroups anyway. It's the newsreader which keeps me from ditching my WebTV altogether. I briefly posted to usenet when I had AOL, but their newsreader was horrible.

"I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me" - General George S. Patton.

Albert the Mildly Deranged wrote:

That depends on what you mean by 'like Outlook Express.' If you mean a poorly designed program that seems to encourage stupidity among its users, and was created by a company convicted of abusing its monopoly status, then no. If you mean a newsreader with a GUI, then yes, I use a newsreader named Pan. Not that the answer matters since usenet is designed to be used by people using everything from simple, text-based newsreaders to fancy GUI programs. Some people don't even have a choice when using 'primitive' newsreaders.

Exatron "Do it with style or don't bother doing it." - Jazz The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Albert Einstein
Chris JonesExatron

*yawn* why do some people have such trouble accepting that OE is a user friendly news reader, and while it may not have the most features in the world, it does the job just fine.

ExatronChris Jones

Chris Jones wrote:

Because it's poorly written, riddled with security holes large enough to drive Unicron through, and user hostile. Nearly every other newsreader has more features and a better interface. Why do you have so much trouble accepting that it is the worst newsreader ever made?

Exatron "Strive for perfection even if others must suffer." - Hook The important thing is not to stop questioning. - Albert Einstein
petbenExatron

in article [email], Exatron at [email] wrote on 6/4/03 6:33 PM:

Just how much "interface" do you need to read plain text?

LooseChanjpetben

On or about Thu, 05 Jun 2003 17:15:13 GMT, petben made the sensational claim that:

Some people need emacs.

This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | This space is for rent It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | Inquire within if you No person, none, care | and it will reach me | Would like your ad here
kauffExatron

Exatron wrote:

...which has a quite funny user agent (newsreader ID):

"Pan/0.13.0 (The whole remains beautiful)"

In case you wondered (heh), mine is Mozilla Mail/News: www.mozilla.org
TCSAlbert the Mildly Deranged

<html><input type crash></html> begin

And isn't it wonderful how OE lets foreign software execute on your machine just because you displayed an infected posting?

I use 2 different news readers

  • Mozilla for message-based groups, like this one
  • Xnews for any binaries groups

Screw Outhouse express. it has security holes so big you could sail an oil tanker thru them.

RobAlbert the Mildly Deranged

I use a few

*outlook for reading / posting (text) *news shark for downloading (bins/yEnc) *Power Post for posting