Sweet Zombie Feedback.

Feb 14, 2003, 3:27 PM ET15 posts by 11 postersalt.tv.futurama
15 posts
Jay Galt.tv.futurama

With the current outrage over the censoring of the word 'Jesus,' it's time to leave some feedback.

You can leave feedback at either the webite below or the email address, or better yet, at both.

http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/gen/help/index.html

[email]

-Jay

Corey M. BarnesJay Galt.tv.futurama

I didn't think it was THAT big a deal so I won't bother, but if you get a response please post it here.

  • CMiB
Itty-Bitties - http://www.itty-bitties.com (for twisted Flash toons)
qazCorey M. Barnesalt.tv.futurama

On 14 Feb 2003 23:18:54 GMT, [email] (Corey M. Barnes)

I disagree - it is a big deal. It changes the finished art. When I saw that, I could tell something wasn't quite right, but I wasn't sure what should have been there in its place.

It had a negative impact on my enjoyment of the show.

Do they treat all religions similarly? Could CN ever even consider showing The Simpsons? Would Homer be bleeped for saying Jebus? What about all the other religious references?

I'm sure there must be more religious references in Futurama, but alas, I'm not quite as familiar with them.

>- CMiB > >Itty-Bitties - http://www.itty-bitties.com (for twisted Flash toons)
Geoduckqazalt.tv.futurama

On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 01:33:58 GMT, qaz wrote:

There's been one broadcast already on CN uncensored; during the gang's visit to the beach, Farnsworth explicitly mentions that by 3000 AD the Second Coming has already... um... come and gone.

Geoduck http://www.olywa.net/cook
Jason SaslowGeoduckalt.tv.futurama

Right, but that was just a casual mention of "Christ". "Sweet Zombie Jesus" to Christians is "taking the Lord's name in vein"...

Either way, I think they're silly for editing. Just put the show on in it's entirety and let the viewer decide whether or not they want to watch. I don't need Cartoon Network to protect me from myself...

Please note: You can contact me directly by sending e-mail to [email], but you must put "[newsgroup-reply]" in the subject line or it will automatically be deleted.
Jay GJason Saslowalt.tv.futurama

"Jason Saslow" wrote in message news:[email]...

Wouldn't saying Jesus always be in vain, since, like, he's not going to respond?

-Jay

I wonder what they're going to do with "A Pharaoh to Remember":

Priest: Great Wall of Prophecy, reveal to us God's will, that we may blindly obey. Worshippers: Free us from thought and responsibility. Priest: We shall read things off you... Worshippers: ...and do them. Priest: Your words guide us. Worshippers: We're dumb.

"Lone Locust of the Apocalypse" wrote in message news:Uqc4a.1285$[email]...

Watch out!

Many people in the UK (mostly as a joke) put on governmental data gathering documents 'Jedi Knight' as a religion but in a funny way it backfired as it got into the British press so maybe it will become an official religion.

When's Robanukah (sp?) ?

Richard.

--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by Expert Anti-Virus. Version: 6.0.441 / Virus Database: 247 - Release Date: 09/01/03

frankJay Galt.tv.futurama

Buy the dvd.

It's not "sweet zombie jesus" since that's from a different episode. It is ____ zombie jesus. i think this one might be holy...

But anyway, i'd suggest people keep the feedback positive, ie no ranting. for some reason calm and reasonable people come off more persuasive than ranting zealots.

"Jay G" wrote in news:[email]:

Paul Hyettfrankalt.tv.futurama

Aren't the censors 'ranting zealots' though?

Paul 'US Sitcom Fan' Hyett - The Wild Frame Grabber of the Net! Website at http://www.activist.demon.co.uk/USsitcoms/

No, they're just being pragmatic.

Matthew Miller [email] <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>

In alt.tv.futurama on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 18:11:24, Matthew Miller wrote :

I bet that's how the KGB & Gestapo described themselves too...

Paul 'US Sitcom Fan' Hyett - The Wild Frame Grabber of the Net! Website at http://www.activist.demon.co.uk/USsitcoms/
David BallPaul Hyettalt.tv.futurama

Futurama had its moments, it was flat out hysterical at times, but it was often a lot coarser and more vulgar than "The Simpsons, " just not as well written. That, and Matt Groenings's antagonistic attitude toward Fox going in, are the reasons it's out of production now. As for censorship, Turner is reportedly paying $10 million for rerun rights. For that money he can run it backwards if he wants.

[email] wrote:

I mean no offense, but it's rather bold of you to claim that your personal opinion of the coarseness, vulgarity and writing of Futurama is accepted fact. It's also a little odd to further to suggest that your opinion had something to do with the demise of the show.

I, for one, happen to think that it was not over the top at all and the writing was great. Of course, this is merely my opinion.

Also, to compare Futurama to the Simpsons with respect to anything other than the actual animation would be the same as comparing NYPD Blue to Battlestar Galactica. They're completely different shows.

Please note: You can contact me directly by sending e-mail to [email], but you must put "[newsgroup-reply]" in the subject line or it will automatically be deleted.

[email] wrote:

By "just not as well written", do you mean "written much better"?

Matthew Miller [email] <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>