March 9, 2004
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00013RBX0/qid=1070782150/sr=8-3/ref=sr_8_3/102-6571185-4215364?v=glance&s=dvd&n=507846
March 9, 2004
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00013RBX0/qid=1070782150/sr=8-3/ref=sr_8_3/102-6571185-4215364?v=glance&s=dvd&n=507846
For the long-URL-impaird, you only need this much:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B00013RBX0/
But, is this really the date, or is Amazon just making things up?
On 7 Dec 2003 17:34:49 GMT, Matthew Miller spewed forth these words of wisdom:
I think I saw the same date at The Digital Bits.
"Matthew Miller" wrote in message news:[email]...
They don't usually post arbitrary dates, since it's bad practice to have customers expect something one day only to find out it's delayed by a few months.
If by "don't usually", you mean "extremely often", then you're right. :)
Seriously, I agree it's obviously bad practice, but that doesn't mean Amazon doesn't do it. Check out this hoopla at Slashdot, for example: <http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/02/03/042240&mode=nested&tid=99> (The book didn't actually come out until September of this year.)
Same thing with Neverwinter Nights when it was first released.