Hedonismbot

Why would such a robot get manufactured? It serves no purpose, not even entertainment as far as I can tell.

On or about Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:06:40 GMT, Darren LaBatt made the sensational claim that:

You say this, in a world where The Fellowship of the Ring is being re-released not half a year later, in a deluxe 4 DVD edition. Quit asking questions and *consume*...or are you a terrorist? *That's* what hedonism bot is for, to make up for slackers like you! ;-P

in article ndLA9.284602$[email], LooseChanj at [email] wrote on 11/14/02 2:49 AM:

Which I watched last night in all it's glory. Very cool new stuff!

"petben" wrote in message news:B9F91D6D.6A2F%[email]...

Yep! All the added scenes and stuff were good and nice and I liked 'em. Sure was a LONG movie, but I loved it.

"LooseChanj" wrote in message news:ndLA9.284602$[email]...

made the sensational claim that:

re-released

for,

To be fair, the 4-disc extended edition was announced before the 2-disc set was released :)

This is actually discussed in a different context on the Season 2 DVD commentaries (Xmas Story). They are talking about homeless robots there - which seemingly are only constructed for the purpose of being homeless. The answer by the team was that either they were never built by man to serve man but by other robots or that there is no explanation (blame the wizards).

mArc

[-mArc-] wrote:

Same goes for the Mafia-Bots...

Florian

It enjoys gluttony for you, so you don't have to.

"Darren LaBatt" wrote in message news:kQIA9.15894$NH2.1675@sccrnsc01...

It made me laugh.

On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 3:06:40 -0500, Darren LaBatt wrote (in message ):

how about fatbot? who needs a fatbot?

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:55:27 -0500, robot prom wrote:

Fatbots aren't really fat. Fat is an organic substance. Fatbot could be some kind of powerful mining robot that got a nickname by looking fat.

--Larry

Or maybe they eat too much.

Maybe that's the point. The same could be said about human hedonists.