David Duke

I, Dr. Wallace R. Wrightwood, on Tuesday the eleventh day of January in the year of our Lord, 2000 at precisely 16:00 hours eloquently stated :

The KKK is made up of several groups within regional branches. Some teach hate, some are Nazi, and some are merely white pride groups. The non-prejudice white pride groups are what Duke once lead. He never led cross burnings or committed hate crimes. I suggest you read his biography, "My Awakening". If you're going to write such drivel, at least get your facts straight. >

Then some poor, ignorant beast (whose name escapes me at the moment) managed to squeak out:

Please forgive my ignorance. How could I be so blind as to think that a group based on hate and racism would have members that supported those views. >>

You are not only ignorant, you obviously disregarded the entire message that I took my precious time to write. I try to enlighten you, yet you repeat the same damn thing you said before. If you could read at the proper level, you would have noticed that I said that not all KKK branches are racist. I hate to repeat myself like this mongoloid, but it's the only way he'll remember.

<< A racist is a racist, no matter how small. >>

I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that.

Sincerely, Dr. Wallace Wrightwood

"No, you're not Wilson. Perhaps I'll meet you later in my travels. In Africa, perhaps. Yes, you look like someone I might meet in the jungle."

-- Teddy Brewster

This is soooooooo not worth my time. Bye! And welcome to my killfile.

Group: alt.tv.futurama Date: Mon, Jan 17, 2000, 11:59am (CST-2) From: [email] (Pete B.) Re: David Duke I, Dr. Wallace R. Wrightwood, on Tuesday the eleventh day of January in the year of our Lord, 2000 at precisely 16:00 hours eloquently stated : The KKK is made up of several groups within regional branches. Some teach hate, some are Nazi, and some are merely white pride groups. The non-prejudice white pride groups are what Duke once lead. He never led cross burnings or committed hate crimes. I suggest you read his biography, "My Awakening". If you're going to write such drivel, at least get your facts straight. > Then some poor, ignorant beast (whose name escapes me at the moment) managed to squeak out: Please forgive my ignorance. How could I be so blind as to think that a group based on hate and racism would have members that supported those views. >> You are not only ignorant, you obviously disregarded the entire message that I took my precious time to write. I try to enlighten you, yet you repeat the same damn thing you said before. If you could read at the proper level, you would have noticed that I said that not all KKK branches are racist. I hate to repeat myself like this mongoloid, but it's the only way he'll remember. << A racist is a racist, no matter how small. >> I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that. Sincerely, Dr. Wallace Wrightwood "No, you're not Wilson. Perhaps I'll meet you later in my travels. In Africa, perhaps. Yes, you look like someone I might meet in the jungle." -- Teddy Brewster

<< This is soooooooo not worth my time. >>

Then don't read it.

<< Bye! And welcome to my killfile. >>

What's a "killfile"? I've heard this mentioned in another NG before.

Sincerely, Robert Muldoon o--(|8[#]

"What would you say if I told you that a yelow submarine was following me?"

kill file n.

[Usenet; very common] (alt. `KILL file') Per-user file(s) used by some Usenet reading programs (originally Larry Wall's rn(1)) to discard summarily (without presenting for reading) articles matching some particularly uninteresting (or unwanted) patterns of subject, author, or other header lines. Thus to add a person (or subject) to one's kill file is to arrange for that person to be ignored by one's newsreader in future. By extension, it may be used for a decision to ignore the person or subject in other media.

http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/kill-file.html