Decision 3012 - WAITAMINUTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

S07E03 Decision 3012liveJun 30, 2012, 8:41 PM ET3 days later9 posts by 3 posters
9 posts
The Doctor (as portrayed by Matt Smith)

Travers uses the time code from "Bender's Big Score" to avert the robot revolution. When the robot revolution doesn't take place, future Travers blinks out of existence.

BUT.......................................

Isn't that supposed to be a paradox-correcting time code?

The Doctor (as portrayed by Matt Smith) wrote:

It did - otherwise, when Nixon was re-elected anyway, the robot revolution would have taken place after all, and Travers would have gone back in time. (Alternative answer: future Travers doesn't really "blink out of existance" - he just never went back in time.)

Also, didn't future Travers hold present Travers when he was born? This should have resulted in future Travers' pretty much immediate death, right?

-- Don

But remember, it was a Paradox-Correcting time code. NOTHING should have happened. That's why there were 873 zillion Benders at the end of BBS.

The Doctor (as portrayed by Matt Smith) wrote:

If you're going to be that way...then it WAS a Paradox-Correcting time code. Without the correction, when Senator Travers became President, the robots never took over, so he didn't go back in time, so Nixon won, so the robots DID take over, so Travers DID go back in time, and so on. However, the code corrected the paradox by not having Travers come back in time after all.

Or, Bender calculated that all of this was going to happen back when he was overclocked...

-- Don
DSFDon Del Grande

On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:55:32 -0700, Don Del Grande wrote:

And since Nixon did win, something must stop him from building the "fence," else Travers goes back in time...

DSF

P.S. Someday I hope they (attempt) to explain how they have just the heads (in jars) of people dead for so long *now* that their DNA is just a dusty memory.

On Thursday, July 12, 2012 2:47:48 AM UTC-4, DSF wrote:

What part of "paradox-correcting time code" do you not understand? (Don't bother answering, I know. The part that's in English.)

This question has come up before, and the answer is always the same. You have to ask Ron Popeill, since he invented the process.

On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 01:01:44 -0700 (PDT), "The Doctor (as portrayed by Matt Smith)" wrote:

See? This is why I rarely post to .alt groups. I always seem to attract someone with a chip on their shoulder. I said nothing to insult you, so why insult me?

But if you want to dance, let's dance, Re: Previously in this thread...

Your answer: Lars Filmore sacrificed himself to defeat Neutar and save Leela. It had nothing to do with paradoxes.

But it did. Lars knew as a duplicate, he was doomed. He had the opportunity to die a hero.

It's been a while since I've seen the episode in question. Was it brought up how Travers time traveled? It is possible to do so in the Futuramaverse without the binary code. (Refer to the Emmy-winning episode for details.)

DSF AKA The Doctor (as portrayed by Tom Baker) BWAHAHAHA!