...away from Rachael Green. In last weeks celeb mag [I think it was] OK in the hollywood gossip section, it says that Jen has seen a movie script in which she plays a prostitute, and she liked it so much she is determined to do it despite the characters role in which she gets her kit off. I doubt Ross would approve. Sooo, people she is moving further and further away from Friends, and no special reunion is going to happen. I predict all the other 5 cast members will have to carry on with there post friends 'career(s)'.
Jennifer takes a giant leap...
Oct 25, 2005, 11:59 AM ET18 posts by 6 posters
18 posts
What do you mean? The Friends reunion movie will simply have Rachel as a prostitute, and Ross as her pimup. It could happen...
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:55:49 -0500, gdp wrote:
NO, you twonk. The script in which she plays a prostitute is for a movie Jen want's to do, and NOT a friends episode or Friends movie. Jen is never going to do a Friends reunion movie or TV episode, Friends is over, finished, gone. All the other 5 cast members post Friends career(s) have more or less sucked. Only Jens career has really taken off, and she sure as hell isn't going back to doing Rachael Green to pull C,L,D,M & M's career out of the pits. They will just have to soldier on as they slowly slid into TV oblivion, why do you think Courteney has taken the time honored and very well trodden route into 'production'.
God you are an idiot. I guess I should have inserted the wink "emoticon" into my post for those that have very little intelligence, and can't infer sarcasm when it is blatant.
"gdp" wrote in message news:z0v7f.3385$UF4.2655@fed1read02...
That was quite funny, Bit frustrating for you, but very funny from here.
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:43:03 -0500, gdp wrote:
Moot.
I guess the words proof read before posting mean nothing to you.
Chrissie, you seem to forget one very important fact about Jennifer Aniston -- she is an A-C-T-R-E-S-S, which means she portrays a variety of characters which have NOTHING to do with her personal life. That's her JOB -- playing different characters in movies and TV. All the cast members, including Jennifer, I feel would have no problem with a reunion unless one of them dies.(God forbd!) I figure that's the only thing that would legitimately prevent one of them from participating in a reunion movie. Plus, why are you referring to "Ross" as a real person? You make it sound like Jennifer would return to the role of "Rachel" as a hooker and "Ross" wouldn't approve! Hello, Chrissie! Wake up and recognize that dividing line between reality and fiction!! ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:33:04 -0700, "Kathy" wrote:
Sometimes Kathy you're so dim you make the character Joey sound intellegent.
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:25 +0200, Magda wrote:
ok, intelligent, happy now.
You're the nitwit, Chrissie. You can't separate reality from fiction. You are talking about these characters on "Friends" like they're real people. "I'm sure Ross wouldn't approve!" WTF is that all about?? You need to take a huge does of reality serum, swallow well, and take another. ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:42:56 -0700, "Kathy" wrote:
And your a stupid American bint, who can't see irony.
Bollocks.
As I said, sometimes Kathy you're so dim you make the character Joey sound intelligent.
Kids today, they grow up so fast.
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:57:23 -0500, "mudboy" wrote:
Yes, how are they all here goig to manage without a Frieds movie.
Can't they get fried stuff at McDonalds? :)
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 06:21:10 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
Typing to fast with fries. ;-)
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:37:50 +0100, Magda wrote:
their, that's where.
Chris is having some keyboard malfunctions..... ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:16:56 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
Yep, this ol broad has seen better days. ;-)