I just read in a Australia's New Idea that the whole cast are having a massive fight over Matthew and how he blammed publisist, when it was his idea that he was to put in a lead actor in a comedy series. The cast were supposably angry with him for not saying it was his idea. Then saying that Matthew said to the rest of the cast that he did it since he and Courteney have now become basically the leads of the show and should be able to put themselves as the 2 leads of the show. Also in teh article it includes how the Friends stars have been stripped from there freebies eg. limo to special events, gym, food..... So they were having alot of discussion and Jennifer told Courteney at the meeting that she thinks they should at least get the gym for free and Courteney said 'no, i want the security', then Matthew joined in and said no i like it how we dont have to pay for the food! So they are all are giving each other the silent treatment! Dont you think that this magazine is full of crap! I mean it could be true but it is so stupid. Especially when Matthew wants the food to be free!!! What do you think?
New Idea Mag
CourteneyL wrote:
I think it's a tabloid. Courteney was not put in the Leading category with Matthew. The thing about losing the freebies may be true, but who knows (or cares) if they are actually bickering about it?
I heard that they were having benefits like keeping their wardrobe taken away, supposedly due to the *huge* rises they got for the next few serise'. I can understand how MP could be mad that he was put in for lead role, what with the unwritten rule that they are an ensemble...blah, blah blah, but (for example) 3rd Rock ft Sun guy John Lithgow (sorry, I *know* it's wrong, but I'm not too familiar with the guy) won best lead actor in a comedy serise (or something to that effect) and he is part of an ensemble show. I think that, yes, it is an ensemble show, but also: They all *Star in it*. They are the 'stars' of the show, the leads. The main characters. So why should they not get the 'lead whatever' awards? (my mini-rant over. I know, i know; it's up to them. They can do whatever the hell they wanna, coz lets face it their rich and famous and beautiful...sorry, slipping into one again...) what was i saying? oh yeah: I think it is true that certain 'Friends-Star-Style-Privileges have been taken away. bye! *J*
in the words of ross gellar.... "That's Crap!"
In article , CourteneyL wrote:
They're just extrapolating a new story from the few details that were made public. Apart from Perry's people, nobody knows what happened.
The thing is that all six of them should be classed as leads.
Tennant Stuart
I saw Lisa Kudrow in an interview last week saying that she felt really bad that Matthew was out of the Emmy race, that she thought she had done a noble thing in taking his name off the ballot, and that she had actually voted for him in the lead actor category before she heard that he had removed himself from the voting.
The guys should be thankful that he is out of the race, since he won't split their votes this year. Not to mention that Matthew was so robbed last year, that he may have won a pitty nomination this year no matter how he did.
JJ
I don't mean to be annoying, but it was actually the Australian Woman's Day magazine that had the story in it....Another tabloid mag full of crap!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------