An inconsistancy? On FRIENDS??? Surely, you jest. <grin>
Denise
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000 13:04:48 +0200, wrote:
|This weekend I was watching series 2 and in the episode where Ross has an |allergic reaction to Kiwi (T.o.w. with the baby on the bus) Monica says he |is also allergic to Lobster. | |But wasnt there an episode in series 3 where Ross, Rachel and her father are |having dinner in a restaurant and are ordering three lobsters??? Wouldnt he |be dead by now :-) | |m@urice | | |
I suppose the two different Carols were discussed on here as well?
he
are
he
Hmm, gee, now that you mention it, I don't think we've ever talked about that. Nor the condom guy being the same actor who later plays Phoebe's brother. And no one has ever asked for the lyrics to "smelly cat." ;)
Denise
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 19:30:57 -0500, "Spitfire 1500" wrote:
|I suppose the two different Carols were discussed on here as well? | |
|he
|are
|he
| |
In article , [email] (Denise Mjelde) wrote:
Or what TOW means, or Chandler's weight, or how stupid Joey is, or where to buy Region 1 DVDs. And no-one wants to talk about Ross & Rachel... ;)
Tennant
Should we just close this NG? :-)
m@urice
Tennant Stuart schreef in berichtnieuws [email]...
to
In article , "Spitfire 1500" wrote:
There's only ever been one Carol, played by two actresses.
Same thing happened with Mindy.
Tennant
If you watch, when the three of them are having dinner Dr Greene says shall I order 3 lobsters but Rachel says no Ross is allergic to lobster so they get him a menu.
I know I've done it before, but remember it's just a show, if you dissect every little detail then sure, you're going to find inconsistencies. Why not just watch it, enjoy it and leave the pedantic nit picking to the Star Trek fans (no offence)
Nick
he
are
he
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000 14:14:28 +0100, "Nick Watts" wrote:
|If you watch, when the three of them are having dinner Dr Greene says shall |I order 3 lobsters but Rachel says no Ross is allergic to lobster so they |get him a menu. | |I know I've done it before, but remember it's just a show, if you dissect |every little detail then sure, you're going to find inconsistencies. Why not |just watch it, enjoy it and leave the pedantic nit picking to the Star Trek |fans (no offence) | |Nick
We like the pedantic nitpicking.
In article , [email] (Denise Mjelde) wrote:
Actually, that's the pedantic picking of nits.
Tennant
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000 04:00:33 BST, Tennant Stuart wrote:
|In article , [email] |(Denise Mjelde) wrote: |
| |Actually, that's the pedantic picking of nits. | | |Tennant
You're right. That sounds much better.
Or is it "picking nits pedantically"?
Denise Mjelde wrote in message news:[email]...
In article , "Nick" wrote:
No.
Tennant
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 18:32:45 +0100, "Nick" wrote:
|Or is it "picking nits pedantically"?
Now you're just confusing me. <grin>
Denise
|Denise Mjelde wrote in message |news:[email]...
| |
In article , [email] (Denise Mjelde) wrote:
Not an inconsistency at all. Maurice was mistaken.
After Rachel warned her father, Ross did not not eat any lobster.
Tennant