haha! eat this R+R fans

Oct 25, 2003, 7:30 PM ET5 posts by 5 posters
5 posts
cookie dude

Here's a quote from People magazine, it's part of an article about David Schwimmer, who's very likely to become a director on _Joey_ "...Not that the star, who has directed Friends and will likely do the same with LeBlanc's spinoff 'Joey' plans to ditch his alter ego completely: "I'll probably bring the character to Joey"

That pretty much takes care of all those "Joey can't up with Rachel, cause he's got a spinoff coming up" - now Ross can't either since he's going to be a semi-regular character on Joey?

Not that any of this matters anymore, 10-04 was pretty obvious as to which direction this is going to take

Into my big mouth, you could fly a plane http://fear.mybigmouth.com
Keith Gowcookie dude

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:30:47 +0200, cookie dude waxed lyrical:

Woah, that's a long bow to draw. He'll probably appear as often as he directs - so that might be twice a year. It's all complete specualtion, of course, but Ross will probably not be a semi-regular.

-- Keith Gow --

DarkeSwordcookie dude

"cookie dude" wrote in message news:3f9b078d$0$19095$[email]...

It probably just means that there's a strong possibility we'll be seeing Ross in some form on the show. He doesn't necessarily have to move to CA like Joey; after all, he's got Ben and Emma in NY. Joey and Ross are pretty close, so the two of them talking on the phone occasionally is probably an idea the writers might use.

Sharky
PamelaDarkeSword

Yes, and even IF David does guest star on "Joey" very rarely he could still be there for some Dinosaur thing and Rachel is at home with the kids, it doesn't mean they may not be together.

"DarkeSword" wrote in message news:bngph8$10af4u$[email]...

pretty

VidcapperPamela

'Kids' plural?!?

Paul 'US Sitcom Fan' Hyett