Here is a link to the cover that reports the "spoilers" for the finale.
http://images.starmagazine.com/images/15448.jpg
The headline is blatantly misleading -- "Jennifer Anistion Dies" -- even if the spoiler were true (which I doubt), it should be "Rachel Green Dies."
And that photograph is not Rachel and the baby in distress, it's from 814 when Rachel feels the baby kick and tells Joey.
Star?? are you kidding? that and the national enquirer are the most misleading and BS magazines in the world! 95% is false/incorrect/made up info!
Sofya
"LizDC" wrote in message news:[email]...
if the
when
http://www.starmagazine.com/stories/feature.cfm?instanceid=20620
Sofya wrote....
Agreed, 95% of the stuff in Star and the Enquirer is crap. But, apparently, this is where the stories on the season finale "spoiler" originated and it's being reported as "fact". The misleading headline and picture on the cover should be an indication of the veracity of the report.
I guess this shows that FRIENDS is once again the big money maker... if trends from two years ago had continued, I am sure the headlines would have read "Survivor IV ends with Rich Hatch's return and his gruesome slaughter of the Manitoba Tribe!"
"LizDC" wrote in message news:[email]...
if the
when
http://www.starmagazine.com/stories/feature.cfm?instanceid=20620
Maybe Star is suggesting if indeed its going to be the season finale what better way to resolve this Joey/Ross/Rachel issue than have Rachel killed off.
"John Carbone" wrote in message news:...
"LizDC" wrote in message news:[email]...
if the
when
http://www.starmagazine.com/stories/feature.cfm?instanceid=20620
I was a little disappointed to find that you had already posted this, as I actually bought the magazine/paper today for the express purpose of putting it on the web. Now I have nothing to justify wasting 2 bucks on this piece of trash.
Oh wait, I've been thinking of putting something under the cats box to catch any spillage. This will do just fine. ;-)
David Buehrle wrote...
I'm sorry. :-(
"LizDC" wrote in message news:[email]...
Eh, I'm over it already. I mean, it's not like I've had a nine year longing, followed by eight years of on-again, off-again with the paper. I'd do better to discard it like one of Joey's one-nighters.
"David Buehrle" wrote in message news:...
You're not the only one who bought it. (Guilty as charged.) But this has got to be the funniest article I've ever read about the Friends season (series?) finale. It sounded more like a sappy fanfic than a TV-drama, and even though Friends can be more dramatic than many other sitcoms on TV, this is obviously just silly rumours. Besides, Lisa Kudrow and David Schwimmer are the ones who want to quit the series; not Aniston.
Also, how on earth is Rachel going to die in the first half of the finale? Jennifer Aniston is going to direct that episode, so I doubt she's going to have a *huge* part in 823.
So 823 is the finale?
Sofya
"Marita Bakken" wrote in message news:[email]...
news:...
I'd
paper.
news:a470p9$2dk$[email]...
If it's a two-parter, I hope they devote the full hour to it!
"Sofya" wrote in message news:...
I believe so, yes. I do know for a fact that Jennifer Aniston will direct the episode that will be taped on March 15th, there is no taping on March 22nd, and the last half of the season (series?) finale will be taped on March 28th. Therefore, it seems logical that Jennifer will direct the first half of the finale.