Courteney Cox Arquette?

Any sign of the bump yet?

Not in the most recent photo. It did look as if she'd cut her hair, though, as did Lisa.

On 14 Aug 2003 14:42:16 GMT, [email] (AlethaAnne) wrote:

Thats not the bump I'm refering to.

I assume you meant "obvious pregnancy". I didn't see any signs of pregnancy. The only change was a haircut.

Just wanted to clarify that point.

On 14 Aug 2003 14:42:16 GMT, [email] (AlethaAnne) wrote:

Seems as I guessed she isn't pregnant after all then, David saying she was was then obviously talking out of his ass, a common occurance for him.

Ooooooo, somebody's jealous!!!!! ~~~ Kathy

"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...

though, as

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:18:22 -0400, "Kathy" wrote:

Of course, if I was rich enough to be able to keep Courteney in the stye she is used to AND more, and our orbits had crossed, and we liked each other, do you think Id want her to marry that big kid instead of me. :p

FYI......Courteney's rich enough to keep HERSELF in the lifestyle she's accustomed to. She certainly doesn't need a man for that. I'm quite sure she earns much more money than David does, anyway. ~~~ Kathy

"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 10:24:37 -0400, "Kathy" wrote:

True, but she's not as rich as Id like to be, and no matter what your level of lifestyle there is always another level above you.

:->

Going by the internet movie database both of them are on $5 million a movie before California and Federal taxes.

You've not factored in her "Friends" salary for 2002-2003 which is $1M per episode. They had 24 episodes last season, so that's a cool $24 million. Don't think David is quite there. So, apparently she must love him for HIMSELF and not his net worth. Plus, it only sounds like you're severly money hungry and I don't think that's what CCA is all about. She's still a good ole' down to earth Southern girl from Alabama who knows love is much more valuable than someone's bank balance. ~~~ Kathy

"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...

she

for

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 16:27:06 -0400, "Kathy" wrote:

True, but 24 million gross before state and federal taxes are deducted.

True, he's a movie actor, not a sitcom actor, and he's probably at the peak of his earning power, as is Courteney, for once Friends finishes her earning/pulling power will go down hill quite quickly, I bet that's why they have sold their John Lautner designed house, and bought a cheaper one in the Hollywood hills, as the up keep is probably less, plus they'd have got a profit form the other house sale.

Well love is blind, and marriage removes the covers as they say over here.

Me and a good many Americans. ;-) Money ='s power, and the only colour that really matters in America is green. How do you know? She could be the biggest financial shark in America, and hides it very well, remember she is an actress, and her profession is to hide her true personality behind a mask of a character.

Love dosn't pay the bills though.

I have to keep reminding myself that you're young and stupid...... BTW, what makes you think that 40 yr. old Courteney would ever be interested in the likes of you? Plus, even if the day came where Courteney was single, she could have her pick of any single male in Hollywood --- actor or not. Everything you've said just goes to show how much you DO NOT know about American women! You're getting her confused with JLo, who lives to flaunt her wealth. Courteney isn't about all that. She was raised with good Southern values and it doesn't matter what "level" of wealth she reaches, those values will always be what keeps her grounded. ~~~ Kathy

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 10:37:04 -0400, "Kathy" wrote:

Im older then she is, and quite clever. And I have to keep reminding myself you as an American woman come across like an Oprah Winfrey guest.

You mean apart from my good looks, charm, wi/sense of humour, good-manners, intellegence, good dress sense, being good in bed...

A player(s) is hollywood land has/have a bigger draw then any actor, no matter what he looks like, as I said money ='s power, and the only colour that matters in hollywood land is green, you have enough $ so you can buy the parent company of the one of the big studios, then you own the studio(s) and are then a major player in hollywood land.

I know your not like English women, but then we British date differently to the way Americans date so its a moot point.

Jennifer Lopez is a high maintence woman, and besides Ive never ever fancied none white women.

Cool, my kinda gal. ;-)

"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...

And modest too.

interested

Alone?

You are = you're not your. Where did you learn English?

You mean non-white?

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 20:11:38 +0000, Erich Wise wrote:

yes, and as we all well know, attacking people for silly grammatical errors and simple typos is the most effective strategy for debunking another person's viewpoint... =p

seriously, lighten up. parent poster is obviously treating all this lightly and as a joke. even if he isn't, what's the point, really?

-brian

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:15:30 GMT, "Brian J. Tarricone" wrote:

<nods>

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 20:11:38 GMT, "Erich Wise" wrote:

Yep.

??

I've had a private theory that I'll share here so I can gloat later if I happen to be correct ;-)

I wonder if they are using a surrogate. Then, his comments about "expecting a baby" would be accurate. And it seems to me that it would fit his character to fool with the press/public by making technically-true but clearly-misleading statements in that unusual situation. (He/they certainly deserve to do so IMO given how much the press has hounded them on this very, very private issue. Having been through infertility myself I know how painful and wrenching it is on a private level without press coverage!)

Just a theory. Please, nobody start rumors!

On 15 Aug 2003 02:46:37 GMT, [email] (Iowacookiemom) wrote:

If the National Enquirer found out, all bets would be off.

It goes with their profession, and the celebrity.