"Friends" nominated for best comedy Jennifer Aniston nominiated for best actress in a comedy Matt LeBlanc nominated for best actor in a comedy
None of the other cast members were nominated. I hope both Jen and Matt win!
"Friends" nominated for best comedy Jennifer Aniston nominiated for best actress in a comedy Matt LeBlanc nominated for best actor in a comedy
None of the other cast members were nominated. I hope both Jen and Matt win!
"AlethaAnne" wrote in message news:[email]...
win!
Matthew Perry was nominated for his guest spot on "The West Wing". I am *so* pulling for him!!
Lesley
Christina Applegate and Hank Azaria (not sure I spelled his name right) were also nominated for their guest spots as Amy Green and David the science guy.
[email] (AlethaAnne) wrote in message news:...
Where can i get the complete nomination list Regards Madhukar
[email] (madhukar_bm) wrote in news:[email]:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:04:49 GMT, Jim wrote:
It also says this:
Tickets are available for $400 (First Balcony), $300 (Second Balcony) and $200 (Third Balcony). To receive an invite to purchase tickets, please fill out the following form.
I bet even with the dearest tickets your well away from the 'stars' and need binoculars to see them.
AlethaAnne likes to play a special version of 'Hey Jude', with 25 minutes of 'na nananana' and an extra verse that goes like this:
woohoo! Go Hank!
Woohoo go Hank??? What about Christina? Sounds like dudey is a little bit gay..... ~~~ Kathy
"cookie dude" wrote in message news:3f224192$0$12998$[email]...
"Kathy" wrote in message news:[email]...
bit
What if he is or isn't. As Joey would say Moo point! Get with the 21st Century!!
Alex likes to play a special version of 'Hey Jude', with 25 minutes of 'na nananana' and an extra verse that goes like this:
Kathy, if you're trying to insult me, why don't you at least *try* to be clever and/or witty? It'd make the whole thing a lot more worthwhile. The way it is you're an annoying lame top-posting old hag. As it happens I think that Hank Azaria's appearances on the show have improved the quality of these episodes quite notably and I don't think he gets enough credit for what he does (not only on Friends, but also on the Simpsons and the various other movies and series he has contributed to). So if he won the Emmy it'd be more than deserved.
Now, to quote one of my favourite movies "if you feel like being mean to somebody, why don't you go home and beat your children?"
Andr�
If I'm so "annoying", why do you keep repsonding to me?? You can't love me because you're gay! Also, I can't beat my children. I have two grown sons and they're both bigger and stronger than me. However, if you ever drag you little gay ass to the states, I'd me more than happy to take a swing at you! ~~~ Kathy
p.s. if you don't like my top posting, tough shit. Scrolling through a bunch of crap to get to the new message sucks.
"cookie dude" wrote in message news:3f23b7d1$0$13011$[email]...
think
various
"cookie dude" wrote in message news:...
The fact of the matter is...KATHY IS A TROLL. She types mean, malicious and stupid posts for no reason. She thinks she is better than everyone else (which she has stated several times), and has created more enemies out of people she's never met than hitler. She doesn't understand the fundamental concept of a newsgroup. All she cares about is insulting people. If someone says something even remotely different from what she thinks (like your hank azaria post), then she goes crazy. Most of us have had problems w/ her. Kathy, get with the program. No one likes you. I suggest you reevaluate your reasons for being part of this newsgroup. Since you seem to have forgotten...it's for people who enjoy talking about and discussing a sitcom called Friends.
Ooooooo, the hotmama has chastised me!!! Ouch!!! (hehehehe) Listen up, chickie.....I've been posting on this newsgroup long before you have. Also, when have I "stated several times" that I believe I'm better than anyone else here??? Show me ONE POST where I've said those EXACT words or even insinuated that!!! You are such an idiot. Most of "us" haven't had problems...only you, chrissie and dudey because you three have this warped, obsessed notion that Ross and Rachel should be together come hell or high water and it's people like you who go through life with blinders on refusing to even entertain the notion there are OTHER directions for people to go with their lives. I suggest you reevaluate your LIFE and try to make some sense of it.
"....it's for people who enjoy talking about and discussing a sitcom called Friends." Duh, ya think? Geeze, who'd of thunk it??
Little girl, don't try to mix it up with me. You won't last through round one. ~~~ Kathy
"hotmamasita" wrote in message news:[email]...
Its been my experiance that NO ONE likes to be attacked or shown in a negative manor and thus get quite defensive when it does happen & this includes supject matter in which we enjoy as well. Everyone is going to have different opionons about stuff that is said in this newsgroup however its how you handel yourself in your responses that determine how others will respond to what you have done or said.
I'd like to take a moment to remind those of you who may have forgotten
(and of course this doesnt apply to those w/o morals or values because that would just create a whole new flame war from people who don't care)
Kids visit this site & post on here. Sometimes your over heated emotions get expressed in a manor that is inappropriate & had a child been standing in front of you while you were verbalizing your response many (granted not all) would have chosen a different approach or at the very least different words to express yourself with.
If you have an issue with someones attitude or the things they are posting there are options in which you can exercise to avoid having be exposed to them. Such as blocking them if you use O.E. or just not reading their posts if you access via google groups.
As for my nephew (11yrs) who enjoys reading this newsgroup during the season, (a fellow spoiler junkie like myself) he doesn't need to be exposed to flame wars or constant negativity or foul language & personaly neither do I so I choose the handy block/ignore option when I see a pattern with an individual.
I recommend for those of you continuiously annoyed by an individuals posts to do the same.
"ImKukie" wrote in message news:bg1hqs$jarj4$[email]...
that
that
get
you
yourself
posts
exposed
do
So maybe someone could write a program to block all "kathy" posts. I'd like to purchase one myself should they be marketed. Otherwise I enjoy this newsgroup.
Terri Smith likes to play a special version of 'Hey Jude', with 25 minutes of 'na nananana' and an extra verse that goes like this:
If you're using Outlook Express, there's a way to do it, simply click on "ignore poster" or something along those lines. It's in the Extras menu
ImKukie likes to play a special version of 'Hey Jude', with 25 minutes of 'na nananana' and an extra verse that goes like this:
Oh, I killfiled Kathy ages ago. It's just sometimes I see what she's written in response to my posts and I comment on it. I'm actually quite proud, I seem to have my first very own usenet stalker, which makes me a usenet celebrity, cos only celebrities get stalkers ;-)
And let's be honest, her posts are mind-numblingly stupid, but the odd one is quite funny...
Andr�
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:16:10 +0200, "cookie dude" wrotE:
news groups should really have a tos agreement made for this kind of situation
Yes yes, she is one of those "long-distance" stalkers that she meantioned. lol.
Yep, you should never block a post that produces a good laugh. ;)
"ImKukie" wrote in message news:...
You're absolutely right. And i apologize for my anger-filled post. It's just sometimes Kathy's racism and her beliefs of Kathy-superiority really gets to me. Once again, sorry bout that. From now on, my posts(and let's hope you-know-who's)will be back to normal.
My "racism"?? When did I ever post a racist remark?? I'm so far from a racist. However, I just don't like you because you don't even have enough nerve to give your real name. As long as you act like a child, I will be superior over you. It's only when you act your age -- whatever that may be -- that you and I will be on a level playing field. ~~~ Kathy
"hotmamasita" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 15:52:03 -0400, "Kathy" wrotE:
you can add me to that list too. :)
so.... you have 2 grown sons huh? Wow, I would be ashamed if my mom acted the way you do... I have pitty for your boys.
Jessie, don't pity my sons....pity your mom. ~~~ Kathy
"Jess" wrote in message news:[email]...
Also,
"Kathy" wrote in message news:...
UNBELIEVABLE. That's all i can really say. You continue to amaze me with your stupidity and immaturity. You, Kathy are not only a bitch (let's face it; it's rather obvious), but you are racist and very discriminatory. I happen to be black, and you jumped down my throat immediately early in the summer. And now you're making gay comments!??!? Can you imagine what would happen if you made these comments in public/person? You would get sued and physically beaten to pulp. I would like to perform the latter task myself, however i'd like to not get arrested. And Actually, you have not been posting on this group longer than i have. I was part of this group YEARS ago as [email] when i had aol, but only recently found out that one can still get newstroups without aol. So yeah, you're in idiot. I really think you don't even read people's posts. You said that I and a few others "have this warped, obsessed notion that Ross and Rachel should be together come hell or high water and it's people like you who go through life with blinders on refusing to even entertain the notion there are OTHER directions for people to go with their lives. I suggest you reevaluate your LIFE and try to make some sense of it." You are one of the stupidest, most close-minded people i have ever had the misfortune to talk to. I have said in nearly everyone of my posts on the subject, that there IS a possiblity that rachel and joey will end up together and that ross and rachel will not. You conveniently failed to realize that. Of course there's a possibilty that rachel will end up with joey; just like she may end up with ross. Hell, there's even a chance that she'll end up with chandler! But we all have our own opinions on how we think the show should and WILL end (which are 2 different things). And i love how you KEEP making statements and assumptions about people having NEVER met them. You called someone a stalker, you say we need to reevaluate our lives.
I honestly don't believe that you're actually an adult; you're probably a 14 year old boy pulling pranks on his mom's account. So you say you've never talked down to people here and/or made comments that you're better? You are full of shit. AND I QUOTE: From: Kathy ([email]) Subject: Re: Is Rachel sweeter & happier with Joey or Ross? Date: 2003-06-15 20:32:27 PST Listen, little girl......I've FORGOTTEN more in my 49 years of life that you'll EVER learn in all your pointless adult years!
and of course: Date: 2003-06-16 12:32:40 PST Yes, I am almost50, but you know what, little girl? There is NOTHING that you can do that will ever top anything that I've already experienced in my adult years. With age comes wisdom -- something that you clearly have no grasp of.
this next one isn't about you thinking you're superior, but it's one of my favorite posts of yours. This one really cracks me up: Date: 2003-06-16 19:52:52 PST I hope to God we never meet. Based on your moniker, you are just a pathetic Jennifer Lopez wannabe. At least I have the guts to sign my posts with my REAL name. hotmamasita = LOSER! Ta-ta, toots!
WOW, even though i really hate you, Kathy, i have to thank you for giving me a good laugh. And WHO CARES if you use your real name!? There's nothing wrong with being anonymous on the INTERNET where people's identities are stolen every day. This of course may not happen to you, althought you probably deserve it, but it's a risk nonetheless. So good luck with that. You think i dont post with my real name because i'm afraid of you?? NOT QUITE, GIRLFRIEND! We'll discuss this in a couple months after someone has assumed your identity.
But good job on the anti-gay comments. That'll get you sued in no time. Just so you know, it's 2003, and now we have something called being "politically correct." I guess you've never heard it. You're late for your KKK meeting. To quote you, the highly intelligent, mature, eloquent, miss congeniality of the newsgroup (and this is one of the stupidest things i've ever read): Kathy = LOSER! Grow up.
hotmamasita likes to play a special version of 'Hey Jude', with 25 minutes of 'na nananana' and an extra verse that goes like this:
leave it alone, she's not worth the effort you're putting into these posts
"cookie dude" wrote in message news:...
i know. From now on, i'm not saying anything else. Everyone knows Kathy has issues.
Strange, isn't it? Jessie, Chrissie, hotmommy and cookie dudey can hurl insults at me left and right, but when I retailiate, I'm labeled a troll, racist, unbelievable and that I have issues. Just goes to show that you four can dish it out, but you can't take it. ~~~ Kathy
"hotmamasita" wrote in message news:[email]...
news:...
posts
has issues.
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:51:00 -0400, Kathy wrote:
for crying out loud, just give it up. i'm relatively new here and i'm certainly not enjoying this 'introduction' to the ng.
-brian
Please, tell us GOOD BYE.
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:11:30 -0700, "phyxsius" wrote:
Can't see Friends winning anything, as 6 Feet Under will grab most of them, as its sharper, and Will and Grace has eclipsts Friends as its for the moment fresher.
6 Feet Under is a drama and not in the same category as Friends. Will & Grace won't win because of the main gay characters. No comedy that has featured main gay characters have won an Emmy. ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:42:45 -0400, "Kathy" wrotE:
The U.S. has never had a female president either, that doesn't mean it will *never* happen.
I never said it "won't" happen.....what I said was that it's never happened SO FAR and I really don't see it happening this year, either. No matter how liberated and free-minded people say they are, the mindset it still pretty archaic. I don't particularly care for Will & Grace at all, but it isn't all because of the gay characters. Will & Grace has been on the air for a long time and it's never won an Emmy out of all the times it's been nominated. That in itself should tell you something about how the voters feel. ~~~ Kathy
"Jess" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:32:28 -0400, "Kathy" wrote:
Well 6FU is a black comedy, and as for the gay thing, well, there's a first time for everything. As for Will and Grace 'been on the air for a long time and it's never won an Emmy out of all the times it's been nominated' if I recall friends didn't win one till season 9, and that could be because it's soon going to finish after season 10, and it was more a case of sentiment then merit.
I agree there is a first time for everything, but it won't happen for Will & Grace. Being nominated is the best it's ever going to get for that show.
This just in: looks like you people have crappier memories than I do! Will & Grace did win Outstanding Comedy in 2000. ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
happened
how
pretty
a
&
has
"Kathy" wrote in message news:[email]...
&
Will
Not only that, both McCormack and Hayes have won acting words.
Lewis.
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:20:27 -0400, "Kathy" wrote:
Oh. <surprised>
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:32:28 -0400, "Kathy" wrotE:
This depends on what generationm you are referring to... I would say that *in general* elderly people are still a bit set in their ways about race and discrimination because of the problems caused by WW2 and a lot of their own parents discriminated against the african race, thus many of them slightly picked up similar beliefs. However, I see VERY little discrimination at all in younger generations, including my own... and I would think the ages of 15-45 years would be the target audience for this show.
Will and Grace has had some tough competition though. It may not be the *most* popular show, but that doesn't mean they aren't worthy of any awards.
Only a very small majority of the public votes, this is not a proper representation of the general consensus to make that asusmption.
I'm not saying that I expect Will and Grace to win, nor am I saying I don't think they will win. I just don't think the reason they would *not* get an award would be based on the sexual preference of the characters like you stated previously, that's all.
Friends (as in the actual show) won its first Emmy last year. Must be a really crappy show then. Didn't really think that through, did ya?
What wasn't thought through was your stupid reply. ~~~ Kathy
"cookie dude" wrote in message news:3f22422f$0$12994$[email]...
Hi Kathy,
You're an idiot. Will & Grace has previously won the Emmy for best comedy. Take your 19th century homophobic views and stick them up your ass. Oh, have a nice day, too.
You're an idiot. Check my other post. Also, I'm not homophobic. But, since you're clearly on the defensive, you must be gay. ~~~ Kathy
wrote in message news:[email]...
I have a question. In the case of best actor/actress, is the entire season considered in the nominating process, or do the actors submit a single episode reflecting their best work for consideration?
If it's the single episode method, I wonder what eps JA and MLB submitted. I think they're at their best when working together, but that may be my J&R fan bias talking :)
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
Uhm, Six Feet Under is a *drama* so isn't competing with Friends against anything. And do you watch W&G? The whole "marriage" sham between Grace and Leo was dreadful, Will is a whiny jerk now, and the show 's finale was had desperation all over it.
Lewis.
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:27:30 GMT, "manhn" wrote:
Its also a black comedy.
England is at least 1 series behind America.
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
Matt
am
Lovely. Too bad the Emmys don't give awards for Best Dark Comedy.
and
had
Then how can you make determinations as to who will or should win Emmys?
Lewis.
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 17:01:01 GMT, "manhn" wrote:
Previous results, all things adopt a pattern, and awards are no differnt.