According to the papers today, Brads moved back. And their going to a marriage councilor-how very hollywood. All very well but the initial problem is still there as in Brad want's to be a father, and Jen want's a movie career. I give this 'reconciliation' 6 months before the strains start again.
Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."
Napoleon Bonaparte
I think the former would be a far more likely thing to make happen... :)
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:53:27 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
Eh?
Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Christopher wrote:
Where does that baby/no baby fairytale come from? Tabloids?
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:02:02 +0100, Lambik wrote:
Common knowledge, as in Brad has made no bones about wanting to start a family, and as it takes two to make a baby Jen's contribution is needed, it's also common knowledge that Jen want's to be a move star, and to get well away from Rachael Green. :-p
Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."
Napoleon Bonaparte
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
---------------------------
Actually, I heard Brad say on more than several occassions that he wants kids even before those two hooked up. I know he does. On an interview with Oprah last year, Jen rubbed her hands together saying "I can't wait (to have the time to have a baby)". She was like, 34 y/o if I am correct. And she should get started if she wants to have a few kids.
Anyway, what I think happened is that Jen smelled trouble/cheating in her marriage and didn't want to have a family on shakey grounds until they straightened things out. When you are in love with someone you want to have a baby with them for that fairytale ending. Hollywood has too many "distractions" that it puts a strain on marriages. Just think, you watch your spouse kissing another person and it's their job!!! How do you know if the feelings are there or not in that kiss?
I don't think Jen could continue her marriage until she was sure that Brad was really in love with her. Bringing a baby into the marriage ain't going to make things better when he goes off and plays another leading role with another gorgeous star.
Stop me if I am wrong.
I agree, Harriet. Too many distractions in that business and there must have been some dissention between them or A.J. wouldn't have been an issue at all. ~~~ Kathy
"Harriet" wrote in message news:Dcrhe.213062$[email]...
with
have
have
if
going
On Sat, 14 May 2005 09:03:17 -0700, "Kathy" wrote:
And the fact that the Good Girl got good reviews wasn't an issue I suppose? IMV they gave Jen big ideas of movie stardom, and she lost sight of her goal of children and a family-blinded by the light if you like. Was the Oprah episode before she did the Good Girl? Looking on the imdb I see that Jen is doing movies back to back up to 2007, and what's the betting they will go like most of the movies the rest of the Friends cast have done, i.e not very good, more isn't always necessarily better, especially when you aren't that talented. Lisa I see has gone back to TV comedy in a Friends type soap.
Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."
Napoleon Bonaparte
i disagree. a woman will always make time to have a baby if she really wants to. oprah was way after good girl. it was when they finished shooting 'Friends'.
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
issue
suppose? IMV they gave Jen big ideas of movie stardom, and she lost> sight of her goal of children and a family-blinded by the light if you> like. Was the Oprah episode before she did the Good Girl? Looking on> the imdb I see that Jen is doing movies back to back up to 2007, and> what's the betting they will go like most of the movies the rest of> the Friends cast have done, i.e not very good, more isn't always> necessarily better, especially when you aren't that talented. Lisa I> see has gone back to TV comedy in a Friends type soap.>
a
wants
she
her
watch
know
Brad
with
On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:11:55 GMT, "Harriet" wrote:
Providing her biological clock hasn't stopped.
Oprah is was reported in NI was going to try to get Brad and Jen back together. But as Brad and Angelina are now an item it's a bit like mission impossible. BTW Brad is shown re wearing his wedding ring. I wish he'd make his bloody mind up, does he wan the marriage to be over or not.
Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Her biological clock stopping at 30 something?? Are you nuts? Women are getting pregnant AND having healthy babies well into their 40's and 50's.
There you go again, believing that garbage in the National [Lying] Enquirer! When will you learn, Chris??? What makes you think Brad and Angelina are "carved in stone"? He may drop her like a hot rock! I'm praying that he does! Angelina Jolie is a slutty looking skank with no class.
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 12:17:17 -0700, "Kathy" wrote:
Yes, that's the general age the ovaries start to pack up shop.
Silly question.
With the help of the nice neighborhood fertility doctors and his/her friendly test tube. Having babies the 'natural way' has nature putting a deadline on that clock, and Jens probably getting close to the cut off point.
When I see the NI put out of business by law suits.
Well they do make a lovely couple, they seem genuinely very fond of each other, and both are mature enough to know the score and approach it like adults, and they both were getting REAL friendly in that African hotel room that night. Women don't get that friendly with a man if they don't like em you know.
True, but then again they may get it on, and Brad may make an honest woman out of Angelina.
Oooo draw you're claws back in Kathy, you're a lady and cattiness doesn't become you. Seriously though, the latest story is Jen wants to adopt a child to get back at Brad. Nice move Jen, thinking of raising someone else's genes.
Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."
Napoleon Bonaparte
When did you get your license to practice as an OB/GYN? You could not be more wrong with that comment you made. Typcial man....doesn't know jack s**t about how a woman's body functions other than when it's time for that 2 minutes of sexual gratification you meen seem to require!
Not a silly question at all. Your comments clearly make you sound (and probably look) like an idiot.
Again, an untrue and completely false statement. I ask again, how long have you been a gynecologist??
Well, Chrissie....the "NI" has been skating on wafer thin ice for many years, printing "just enough" fact to keep their keisters out of a sling. The rest of the BS they print is just that -- bullshit!
Jen and Brad made a "lovely couple", too. As a matter of fact, Jennifer is 100% prettier than skankyJolie. This is a trist and a fling for both of them. Brad is going to wise up to her sluttiness soon. Any woman who would French kiss their own brother on national TV deserves every bad name and remark tossed at her. Granted, she did "trade up" big time from that ass-ugly Billy Bob Thornton, but the skank totes a vial of blood around her neck.....how deranged and sick is that?? BTW...that kid of hers? Adopted....
The Pope couldn't make an honest woman out of Skankgolina Jolie!!!
See my post above about the adopted child.....apparently, Skankgolina doesn't want her DNA passed on, either!
~~~ Kathy
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 13:32:35 -0700, "Kathy" wrote:
I haven't which you well know. :-|
Ah hem, we English last for 7.6 minutes and you're Yankee men don't, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1622297,00.html during our 'sexual gratification', not that we get many thanks from you women. Rule Britannia. :-)
I'm far from an idiot my sweet, and don't look like one either-how's you're blue rinse holding up, or are you a Desperate Housewife? If you bother to read any medical text book regarding human female reproduction ability's you'll see that a woman's biological clock runs out when she has passed an age marker, and after that it gets progressively harder for a woman to conceive, let along go full term.
How long have you been reading medical text regarding female human reproduction.
How long do you give it then before the said ice breaks?
Physically yes, but Jen's had ideas way above her professional ability, hence she's no longer Mrs Pitt.
But Angelina is a more accomplished actress.
Mmmm, we will see after the release of 'Mr & Mrs' as to whether it'll last. BTW I'm going to see it on Saturday. :-)
Oh I'm quite sure he's well aware as to how much she can be a slut in bed. lol
As does an actress who is very clingy to a fellow actress she starred with over 10 years.
I'm not one to comment on personal matters like that.
Yeah, I know.
If she's a catholic.
Well who'd want to share genes with Billy Bob, with Brad Pitt we'll she probably figures that's different. ;-)
Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."
Napoleon Bonaparte
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
Then you need to stop making medical "comments" regarding the female reproductive system, of which you know nothing.
7.6 minutes? You time yourself? (hehehe) What a hoot!
Not a "desperate housewife" since I work full time and my children are both grown men. I don't HAVE to read a book on the female reproductive system -- I AM female and used to have the system! I knew how it operated and still do!
Again, I don't have to "read text" regarding the female reproductive system. See above.
When they print the story they'll never be able to recover from legally and financially, and from the crap they've been showing on their covers lately, that story is just around the corner!
She is no longer "Mrs. Pitt" by HER choice, not his.
By what standard? Physical appearance or genuine talent? She has no talent, at least not on the screen.
What will watching the movie have anything to do with the future of their "so-called" relationship? Nothing, that's what!
Again, that's the ONLY place where she has genuine talent, apparently!
WTF are you talking about??
Why not? You seem to comment on everything else!
Still wouldn't matter.....
She thought enough of BBT to wear a vial of his blood around her neck on a chain and get a stupid tatoo with his name emblazened across her butt or wherever! ~~~ Kathy
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:52:49 -0400, "Kathy" wrote:
Can I read about please Miss?
Read the article before you reply you daft middle aged bint.
Good for you.
Any idea as to which celeb will be the proverbial straw?
Well she did prefer to have a movie career to being a mother, hence their professional differences, Brad is a movie star, Angelina is also a movie star, and Jen is a TV actress who would wants to be a movie star.
You don't need 'genuine talent' to be a movie star, you need screen presence, in that you dominate the screen whenever you are on it.
<sigh> Not up to speed today are we Kathy. IF this...relationship is just to promote the movie, it'll be over shortly after the said movie has been released and the personal appearance promotion work is done. However IF, their is a genuine affection and a real relationship developing between Brad and Angelina, then it'll continue into the near and mid term future. Clear enough for you my angle. As for me watching the said movie, well it'll give me a chance to see them and the said scenes which started this whole episode, plus it look a good movie form the trailer.
And yet she stars in movies that make lots of $$$$.
Jesus H Christ, WTF are you on today Kathy, Prozac?
That was in her past, her...relationship with Brad is today and now.
<shrugs> Whatever.
It must have been a phase she was going through.
Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."
Napoleon Bonaparte