It has to be Tag's. She hasn't been out with anyone for a while, before he came along. It can't be Ross's, as they haven't slept together in ages.
Charlie.
It has to be Tag's. She hasn't been out with anyone for a while, before he came along. It can't be Ross's, as they haven't slept together in ages.
Charlie.
Just because the camera zoomed in on her at the end doesn't mean she's pregnant! People must stop jumping to conclusions! Also one more thing, in season 3 rachel says sh'es 28, but mysteriously four years later in season 7 she turns seven. Yet another continuiuty error to do with ages by the writers
owen
"Charlie" wrote in message news:[email]...
well sorry!
"Apc" wrote in message news:[email]...
Owen Shiers wrote:
Just because the camera zoomed in on her at the end doesn't mean she's pregnant! People must stop jumping to conclusions!
If people should stop "jumping to conclusions" will other people then stop whinging about piddling little continuity errors that have been posted here a thousand times before.
Also one more thing, in season 3 rachel says sh'es 28, but mysteriously four years later in season 7 she turns seven. Yet another continuiuty error to do with ages by the writers
I don't think the continuity error was quite that bad.In article , "Owen Shiers" wrote:
It's not an error, they did it deliberately, for the sake of a good story.
However, saying that Rachel turned seven *is* an error... ;)
Tennant
"Owen Shiers" wrote in message news:oDk37.22751$[email]...
So, they have the cameras set on Monica and Chandler, and he asks "Who's is it?" and then almost immediately camera zooms on Rachel (with Pheobe saying the obligatory "oh how beautiful they look together" spiel about the wedding couple). How are we NOT supposed to assume it's her??? Cinematrics suggests that we DO assume so, even though on second thought it may be wrong.
Nellie
The way the camera zooms to her is definitely leaving us to assume she's pregnant. Doesn't mean she actually is, but that's what they want us to think.
And in season three, they did say she was 28, same as in season five. Was there no two years between that?
In article , [email] (Sam) wrote:
Where in Season 5 does it say that?
Tennant Stuart
"Tennant Stuart" wrote in message news:[email]...
whether the writers are playing mysterious with us or whether they're too laxy to check the ages!
owen--
In article , "Owen Shiers" wrote:
Apart from Joey, the ages hang together quite well, actually. At least until Rachel in 714 "TOW They All Turn Thirty", which was a deliberate move for the sake of a good story, much more important.
Tennant
Ross is DEFINITLEY the father of Rachel's child, and NO ONE ELSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Amagansett Waves of Grain
------------------------------------------------------------
Get your FREE web-based e-mail and newsgroup access at:
http://MailAndNews.com"Amagansett Waves of Grain" wrote in message news:[email]...
and this theory is basod on sound and definite evidence I suppose?
owen>
Amagansett Waves of Grain
Never underestimate the strength of evidence that wishful thinking has...
"Shadout Mapes" wrote in message news:[email]...
yes well I suppose we're all guilty of it at some point
you guys are going to be so surprise.....i was told that joey is the father...but rachel and joey didn't sleep together. remember few seasons back when joey said that he donated his sperm in the lab...that is how rachel got pregnant.
Owen Shiers wrote in message news:tmn47.45161$[email]...
at first i thoguht that it could be rosses but now im beging to think that its joeys. bye, me, (of course) erene, (it is pernounced erin)
Amagansett Waves of Grain wrote in message news:...
And....how old are you???