HUH..... what is it good for? http://www.winkleman.co.uk/war.html
(stolen from AMO, but it's too funny not to share)
HUH..... what is it good for? http://www.winkleman.co.uk/war.html
(stolen from AMO, but it's too funny not to share)
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:39:51 +0100, "cookie dude" wrote:
Whats it got to do with Friends?
Bush and Blair are friends?
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:14:17 -0000, "Dr Zoidberg" wrote:
No their not, and I ment alt.tv.friends.
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
War makes for strange bedfellows.
Despite wearing pink lacies, Christopher looked like a real lumberjack when saying:
ok, I forgot the OT, I'm sorry. If you want to get anal, your signature indicator is wrong and it's longer than four lines, which is also a "violation" of Usenet standards. Dick
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:19:40 +0100, "cookie dude" wrote:
My sig is as long as I want to make it. And you'll find sigs a lot longer then mine. Plonker.
Yay, a flame war. Kind of en vogue!
*Christopher* :
You don't have a sig (in a Usenet sense), just some random text below your name at the end of your posts. F'up2 poster
Despite wearing pink lacies, Christoph Paeper looked like a real lumberjack when saying:
it's not a sig in the truest sense of the word, but you get where i'm coming from, yeh? :)
Despite wearing pink lacies, Christopher looked like a real lumberjack when saying:
you were the one to start getting anal you fucking freak. usenet code of conduct says no more than four lines to a signature (and no more than 70 characters per line), and it has to be indicated by a "-- ", ie dash dash space. either fix your signature, stop bitching about me forgetting the offtopic indicator, or burn in the fires of hypocrisy. whether there are signatures longer than yours is not the point
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:06:59 +0100, "cookie dude" wrote:
Thats funny coming from a moron who can't even use his name in his post, or is your name really "cookie dude"?
In message [email] (Christopher) wrote:
Pease keep this place friendly. Insults won't get you anywhere. If don't want to comply with rules of good behaviour, that's not only your problem as it causes annoyances to others.
I totaly agree with this. Sigs shall be no more than 4 lines and, most important, you must use a real sig separator "-- " so that people who reply to your posts don't quote your signature.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:13:38 +0100, stephane HAbeTT roux wrote:
I didn't start it.
Despite wearing pink lacies, Christopher looked like a real lumberjack when saying:
FOAD. plonk
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:36:23 +0100, "cookie dude" wrote:
Cookie Dude FOAD Plonk, what an unusual name.
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:55:24 GMT, [email] (Christopher) wrote:
With every post, you're only making your usenet ignorance more and more obvious. You'd do well to read up on usenet faqs before berating others here.
Priya
Despite wearing pink lacies, p r i y a looked like a real lumberjack when saying:
ahh, the funny side effects of killfiling, first I thought you meant me :)
Andr�
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 11:47:29 +0530, p r i y a wrote:
Well Im trying to see 'cookie dude's point of view, but I can't get my head that far up my ass.
In article , "cookie dude" wrote:
I'm on your side Andr� - but it is a touch ironic that your thread about war, and what it is good for, has ended up virtually being a war...
Tennant