Reflections From A Fanatic

May 6, 2004, 2:45 AM ET19 posts by 15 posters
19 posts
Dan Silverstein
    Less than 24 hours from now, NBC will air the last episode of
television's best sitcom.
    I still can't believe it.
    For the last ten years, Thursday nights were off limits.  College
courses were scheduled around the 8PM time slot.  Dinners were cut
short. Appointments had to be rescheduled.  Thursday nights belonged
to "Friends."  The success of all NBC's other Thursday night shows...
from
"ER" to "Scrubs" to "Will & Grace"... they all came back to "Friends."
    Tomorrow, it will all be over.
    And yes, we'll have "Joey," but there is no way the magic of the
full cast can be recaptured in a spinoff.  The whole was always greater
than the sum of the individual parts, and while no disrespect is
intended
towards the acting abilities of Perry, Aniston, LeBlanc, Cox, Schwimmer,
and Kudrow, there was something special about the way the six interacted
together that will probably never be duplicated on television.
    Let's face it... the end of "Friends" almost certainly marks the end
of the television sitcom as we know it.  Somewhere around 1999,
producers stopped trying to recreate Bright, Kauffman and Crane's
masterpiece and started to rely on "reality television."  Name one
sitcom developed after "Friends" that has become a cultural phenomenon.
Can't do it, can you?  In ten years, "Friends" has remained at the top
of the ratings, on the tip of our tongues, in the back of our minds,
at the forefront of our culture, on the covers of magazines and tabloids
across the nation.
     You may know people who don't watch "Friends," but do you know
anyone who doesn't know who Ross and Rachel are?  Survivor contestants
will come and go.  In twenty years, no one will remember a single winner
of "Fear Factor."  People will remember Chandler.  People will remember
Monica.  People will remember where they were when Rachel kissed Ross
after watching the prom video, where they were when Monica peeked out
from under the covers of Chandler's bed, where they were when Phoebe
gave birth and when Joey fell in love with Rachel.
     There is a reason that tomorrow's broadcast of the final episode
of "Friends" is attracting Superbowlesque attention.  The reason is that
even for those who don't watch the show religiously, it is easily
to recognize that the series was a major force in our culture for the
past decade.  Scripted television rarely holds an audience's attention.
"Friends" did it for ten years.
    	Seven seasons of "Friends" are now available on DVD.  Episodes
are regularly run in syndication.  And even now, ten years later, reruns
still seem as fresh as they were when they first aired;  in some cases,
older episodes become even better in the second or third viewing.
Even now, I find it hard to leave the room while an episode of
"Friends" is on, even one I have seen a dozen times, even one I can
watch at my leisure on DVD.
    	"Friends" somehow managed to achieve that perfect blend of
humor and emotion, reality and fantasy, drama and comedy.  It was
not a perfect show, and some episodes are clearly superior to others.
But it was, and will probably remain, the greatest sitcom television
has ever seen, and it is truly sad to see it go.
    	Six years ago, I wrote an imaginary "Friends" script depicting
the way I thought the show should end.  It was a labor of love, my
personal tribute to a show that had entertained me for so long. It was
entitled "The Last One." And as I sit here tonight, dreading the
inevitability of tomorrow, it strikes me that I never thought I
would actually have to watch "The Last One."  It always seemed
like something that would never happen, the way that on your first
day of school, graduation seems like an eternity away.  But I suppose
nothing lasts forever.
    	I hope you all enjoy tomorrow's episode, and I hope that anyone
associated with the series who happens to read this message realizes
how much laughter they have helped deliver to a world in dire need
of it.

Until tomorrow... Dan Silverstein

AllanDan Silverstein

Couldn't agree more :-)

"Dan Silverstein" skrev i en meddelelse news:[email]...

LadySycamoreDan Silverstein

Dan Silverstein wrote:

Even though I've only kept up with the last 5 seasons, this post said it ALL. Couldn't snip a single word! And you are right about the cultural impact this show had. As I said, I didn't watch the first 5 seasons, but damnit if I wasn't aware of the show by the buzz generated by it.

The cast should be sent this post. It was wonderfully written and expressed. Thanks. :-)

~LadySycamore~ Co-Administrator dialyze.org: For renal patients by renal patients http://dialyze.org/forums/index.php
lkng4chubsDan Silverstein

Well said, but the only show that I can come close with as far as a cultural following would be "Sex in the City." I am not comparing the two in any way other than the Clut following part. Considering it doesn't fit in the same catergory.

You are right about the Reality shows though, but they didn't come along because no one could make a hit sitcom. It started with MTV's "The Real World." and took off from there.

Another style of show that I am tired of seeing. Law & Order, Criminal Justice, CSI: (Insert multiple cities here) I liked them at one time. But did you notice that they take the same shows, change the names and a few bits and pieces and replay it?

"Dan Silverstein" wrote in message news:[email]...

Beyond TherapyDan Silverstein

That was beautiful dude. As in the words of the Chan-Chan Man himself, in between choked tears: "I was not ready for this today..." ;-)

Seriously, these are wise words you speak. It's very rare for many shows to last as long as "Friends" has. My other most favourite TV show has actually been around for longer - 12 years now, with no signs of stopping yet, and that became a huge phenomenon in itself at the time. But even that show just isn't as popular as it once was. The staying power that "Friends" has had is really quite remarkable.

As long as things are remembered, they will never truly die. :-)

Dan SilversteinBeyond Therapy

"Beyond Therapy" wrote in news:OHwmc.10816$[email]:

I'm assuming you're referring to "The Simpsons"... case in point as to how remarkable "Friends"' success truly is. Even at the height of its popularity, "The Simpsons" probably never once broke the top 10 in the Nielsen ratings. (I don't have any hard facts to back that claim up, just my own personal recollections over the past twelve years.)

Now, I'm certainly not suggesting that popularity and quality always go hand-in-hand. But my point is, "Friends" has been the most-watched show in its genre on television for the majority of the years it has been on the air. Not sure any other sitcom can make that bold claim. And even though at times the writing slipped into lazy characterization and predictable plotlines, for the most part, the show continually kept things fresh by constantly reinventing itself: Ross and Rachel get together in the second season, they split up in the third season, Chandler and Monica's relationship completely rekindled the show's passion in the fifth season, and then when the well seemed completely dry, Matt LeBlanc almost singlehandedly brought the show back to new life with Season 8's unrequited romance with Rachel.

Beyond TherapyDan Silverstein

"Dan" wrote in message news:[email]...

Actually, I wasn't referring to "The Simpsons" - hadn't even crossed my mind. My other fave show isn't even a sitcom.

MeDan Silverstein

On 6-May-2004, Dan wrote:

The Simpsons got several Emmy awards including Best Prime Time Show (or something like that)

Frank HalaburakDan Silverstein

I just finished watching the final show. Now I am sitting here thinking of something to write.................. Dan, I couldn't have said it any better than your post. Thanks, Frank

Frank HalaburakDan Silverstein

"Frank Halaburak" a �crit dans le message de news:...

thinking of

Thanks,

Raymond ChuangDan Silverstein

Dan Silverstein wrote:

Dan,

NBC dominating Thursday nights actually dates from the 1980's, when you had the juggernaut of "The Cosby Show," "Family Ties," "Golden Girls" and "Night Court." The precedent set by these four shows made NBC a major programming powerhouse--don't forget that "Cheers" ran on Thursday nights, too. And it was this dominance from 8 to 10 pm that made it possible for the huge success of "E.R."

Raymond

Jonathan RobertsDan Silverstein

Dan Silverstein wrote:

Dunno about that for me, but it's surely in the top ten. I haven't found much to write about it in recent years, nor have I found many threads here in the group to comment on, but it's kept me watching.

Jonathan Roberts * guitar, keyboards, vocals * North River Preservation To reach me reverse: moc(dot)xobop(at)ggestran
Paul HyettDan Silverstein

It was the reason I first got cable TV.

Still 3 more weeks for us Brits.

There's not been one new US sitcom in the past 3-4 years that I've been able to get into. I may have to (gasp)... change my sig!

Nine & a half here. :)

Whose house will the wake be held at?

Paul 'US Sitcom Fan' Hyett
cookie dudePaul Hyett

Paul Hyett wrote:

I quite enjoy Scrubs, but it's a very different show. I wonder, why on some Scrubs msg boards they pride themselves in being smarter than Friends fans, based merely on the fact that Scrubs doesn't have a laugh track

Feel free to come around - but bring a couple of beers if you do ;)

We're the generation of men raised by women - I'm wondering if another woman is really the answer we need... http://fear.mybigmouth.com
randyDan Silverstein

Could you BE any more right?

(Sorry, someone had to say it.)