The Official Joey/Rachel story

Jun 12, 2002, 3:05 PM ET20 posts by 10 postersalt.tv.friends
20 posts
CoffeeQueenBryanalt.tv.friends

"Bryan" wrote in message news:[email]...

S P A C E

just in case :)

Phoebe center stage?? YAY!! Finally, she'll get the spotlight!!!

p r i y aCoffeeQueenalt.tv.friends

"CoffeeQueen" wrote in message news:...

I very much doubt that it is going to be anything interesting. They have signed that guy who played Cliff for three episodes next season.

In article , [email] (p r i y a) wrote:

They can't claim anything. Despite that lie, "Friends Creators", the article was not from Kauffman & Crane, who won't reveal their plots.

Tennant

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR
MaizeandblueBryanalt.tv.friends

[email] (Bryan) wrote in message news:...

Actually, this quote and article is taken word for word from an online article written by Wanda of EOnline. Her credibility is at best very suspect, and she has made no secret that she is a huge Rachel/Ross fan, so her motivations for writing this, and how accurate it really is, should be questioned.

And it was not a Friends producer saying this, it was an "NBC insider". And for all we know, Wanda's "NBC insider" could be the janitor...

The Friends producers have been quoted by reputable sources as not even planning to think about storylines until the writers gather a couple of months later. (This was back in April, so they would just start to be meeting now.)

They wouldn't be so quick to come out and give details of focusing on Phoebe and nixing the Joey marriage, unless they have gotten information that people were very upset by the cliffhanger. This wouldn't seem to make much sense, since the producers were making all these hints just a month ago about Joey still being involved, because people were very upset that he was NOT involved in the storyline anymore.

Bryan wrote:

S P O I L E R

S P A C E

Not so much a spoiler as it is stating the obvious......

Andr�
The Netherlands is this make-believe place where Peter Pan and Tinkerbell come from...

In article , "Cookie Dude" wrote:

S P O I L E R

S P A C E

Stating the obvious? Which has more story possibilities, a tangled set of relationships, or the boring normality?

Tennant

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR

Tennant Stuart wrote:

I'm just adding up what has been said recently and arriving at a conclusion. Since Emma won't have a lot of screen time, I don't think they will carry on with this triangle a lot longer, as at least one of the parents needs to look after her and to have Ross babysit her, while Rachel is enjoying her new relation with Joey is something I find questionable.

Also, if Joey considers kissing ones friend's mother "breaking the code", I don't see how he could justify for himself that he's going out with the ex-wife of one of his best friends, who's also the mother of his daughter. The way Joey has come across over the course of the series, I think he'd be much too guilt ridden to "enjoy" being with Rachel.

And what are you doing in a supposed Spoiler thread anyways? ;)

Andr�
The Netherlands is this make-believe place where Peter Pan and Tinkerbell come from...

"Cookie Dude" wrote in message news:aecnd4$9l3$[email]...

conclusion.

on

I

be

My guess is that he didn't know it was a spoiler thread, since the labeling does not call it such.

My take on whether or not Wanda knows what she's talking about: that's a clear, certain, definate well...maybe.... She does not have a good track record at all over the course of the show, and for a long time it was clear she was getting most of her accurate information from the filming reports over at Angel's. This last time, it's pretty certain she got a real mole. She accurately predicted:

  • A proposal scene from an unexpected direction.
  • The ring in the wrong hands.
  • The proposal and the ring as an accident.

Somebody told her. Now, that does NOT mean this most recent news is necessarily authentic. Her mole may have dried up, or they could be leading her astray on purpose. So I take her news with a little hope and a whole lotta salt.

unreliable, NBC representatives do *not* create or produce "Friends".<<<

No, apparently they just force the producers to rewrite their cliffhangers and change their entire story arc because the show was #3 instead of #1 after Joey lost his shot with Rachel! :-) Certainly the suits take notice of such things!

p r i y aabrahammyalt.tv.friends

On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 03:31:31 GMT, in alt.tv.friends you wrote:

Only if Ross is still has feelings for Rachel. Come September, Ross might have forgotten what Phoebe told him. ;)

No, I'm sure it was because he was sure that this was a bogus spoiler since real spoilers won't start until filming starts in August. :)

Claire, the imdb has been inaccurate because they get their stories from tabloid sources. Wouldn't it be interesting if BKC confirm that theory in their season 8 DVDs? :)

Priya

abrahammyp r i y aalt.tv.friends

"p r i y a" wrote in message news:[email]...

Stating the obvious:

Rachel has spent the five previous episodes flittering around the idea of being with Ross - and, as we learned in the season finale, he has avoided it only because he's afraid for Emma's sake. They did not get married early in the season because they did not want a marriage only for the sake of the baby, and Rachel resented the idea that she could not do it alone. Ever since she has moved in with Ross, Rachel has depended more and more on him, and in 820 her own mother expressed confidence that Rachel would be alright ONLY because Ross was with her and would help her. Had Ross not been there, Sandra would have moved in.

In the last two episodes, Rachel kisses Ross repeatedly, sometimes with deep feeling, and she gave the child his last name. She confides in Janice that she wants Ross back, and it is Janice - a mildly antagonistic, neurotic guest character - who immediately makes assumptions about Ross' paternal instincts which do not match what we have seen from him in the past. This scares Rachel, and she wails to Joey primarily about how afraid she is that Ross will abandon her. Joey agrees that he might, offers his own eternal support, and when he finds Ross' ring, Rachel makes a desperate assumption. Her reply, a wobbly "OK", is the least romantic way a woman could accept a marriage proposal without being rude. Joey himself is wild-eyed with shock and worry. He knows this situation is unfortunate.

Priya made a very good post several weeks back. When Ross grabbed Rachel to induce labor and they started kissing, the crowd went wild. She very sensibly asked, "Is this really the way you want them to get back together?" I thought there would have to be more than that. We got it. Ross admitted he was in love, they had several real kisses, and Rachel began thinking seriously about going back to him.

I am inclined to ask the same intelligent question now. Is this the way you want Joey and Rachel to become lovers? Over a desperate, neurotic mistake? Right now Rachel has done exactly what she told Ross she wanted to avoid earlier in the year; she's prepared to marry for the sake of the baby, and out of fear of being left alone, not out of love.

They have been crafting the last seven episodes of the season very carefully toward an R&R reunion, with Joey thrown in primarily to create a suspenseful cliffhanger. I do not think this love triangle will carry on much longer; for one thing, somebody's got to take care of the newborn. There was a very strong negative reaction to the idea of Ross taking custody; how would people feel if he did all the caretaking while she ran around with Joey all the time? There will have to be ample time for the man (probably Joey) who loses in the this love triangle to recover and find his happy ending. M&C are due a major story arc and they REALLY need to stop ignoring Phoebe. There ARE stories to tell that don't involve the neverending saga of R&R, so maybe they should stick 'em in a corner with their kid and bring the other four to their satisfactory conclusions. For Joey to get the girl, this saga is going to have to drag on for some time, and it's already on its encore.

p r i y aabrahammyalt.tv.friends

"abrahammy" wrote in message news:...

Did she? This is what she really did in those five episodes:

818 - They pretended to be married and make money out of it. She was touched by Ross's plan for proposing to her all those years back. She says it would have been "hard to say no to" had he proposed then. We saw no indication from either one of them that she would say 'yes' now.

819 - Rachel lies to a reporter about the baby's paternity in front of Ross. What in that episode said that Rachel wanted to be with Ross?

820 - Rachel is scared about being a new mom. Ross promises to be there for her as is his duty as her friend and father of her child. Nothing remotely romantic there.

821 - A classic Princess Bitch episode. She gets jealous because an attractive woman finds his dinosaurs intriguing. "Yes! And not because I want you to go out with me, but because I don't want you to go out with anybody!" So, where is the love there?

822 - She wants to have sex with him so that it would induce labor. Hardly, a romantic setting. They had clumsy, almost unbearable kisses in this episode. The nice kiss at the door before leaving was to celebrate the impending birth of their child IMO. I'd have to see them kiss like they did in 207 to accept any romantic indications.

We never heard exactually heard him say that he still loves Rachel. Mind you, Rachel explicitly said that she still loved Ross back in Season 4 and that didn't last for more than a couple of episodes in the next season.

Yes, but what does that have to do anything? Ross is and has always been a great guy and a good friend. I wouldn't have expected anything short of what I saw in 820 from him. He offered to be there for Rachel to help with the baby. That doesn't indicate any romantic inklings.

For all we know, Rachel's "Okay" may turn out to be, "Okay, what are you doing with the ring?". Plus, we have never heard what Rachel actually thinks about a relationship with Joey. I, personally don't think Joey would go along with the supposed proposal. All said and done, the fact remains, none of us know what is going to happen in 901. It is too early to jump to conclusions that a J&R relationship is hanging on this "proposal" and hence it is doomed.

Janice scared the wits out of Rachel with the realities of single motherhood. Rachel was trying to grab at something by hoping that the little kisses with Ross would lead to something and she wouldn't be alone. That is quite different from a well considered reconciliation with Ross. Had she been really serious about going back to Ross, would she be so quick to accept a proposal from Joey at the drop of a ring? (no pun intended) :)

I don't think that Rachel is in love with Joey yet. She isn't in love with Ross either but the fact that she is willing to accept a marriage proposal from Joey indicated that she is willing to look at him as more than a friend. This is the angle I want to see more of. If the acceptance was only based on panic, she would have accepted a proposal from Gunther; somehow I doubt that.

If Rachel is a responsible mother and I hope that she will be, she isn't going to dump the baby on Ross. Joey isn't some stranger that wouldn't want to hang around a woman with a newborn. Ross's access to Emma would be a problem if this was a RL situation. It's pretty obvious that in Friends land, the problem of Ross losing on Emma won't happen. They would all be hanging around together and Ross would get to see Emma just as much as he would, if Rachel and him were an item.

That depends on the writing. I think if Ross gives his blessings, there won't an issue. He already did so in 816 and we don't know what is in his head as he's walking towards her room.

Priya

Lauriep r i y aalt.tv.friends

"p r i y a" wrote in message news:[email]...

news:...

Dude"

knot,

his

tangled

of

him,

alright

there,

deep

that

This

that

eternal

assumption.

a

shock

Rachel to

together?"

admitted

you

mistake?

and

carefully

suspenseful

longer;

very

all

M&C

R&R, so

other

saga

encore.

Priya, you make some very good points. The writers have been very smart and have been intentionally putting out vague "hints" because of the very obvious reason that they want us to be uncertain about the future. They want us in suspense. They would not have any obvious confessions of feelings from the characters because that would reveal too much. This way, we can all take these episodes and interpret them the way we want to. All this debate keeps us interested while the summer ticks away.

p r i y aLauriealt.tv.friends

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:37:25 GMT, "Laurie" wrote:

Thanks Lauire. That's what cliffhangers are for, to keep us in suspense and to debate it to death here on ATF. :)

Priya

S P O I L E R

S P A C E

*
*
*
*
*

Much stranger things and relationships have occurred in the world of sitcoms. If Joey has Ross's blessing, I think he would get over whatever guilt feelings he might have. And I think Ross would rather take care of Emma while Rachel is out with Joey than while Rachel is out with some strange guy he doesn't know at all. She is now the mother of one of his children - any man she is with is potentially a step-father of Ross's daughter.

In article , "Cookie Dude" wrote:

S P O I L E R

S P A C E

S P O I L E R

S P A C E

Okay so you find it questionable, but that's what stories are like, people doing things that (hopefully) you wouldn't do.

Joey didn't justify it for himself, he worried about it for weeks, since he felt that his feelings were inappropriate. However, his good friend Ross eventually persuaded Joey to try, since he's in love with her.

There *are* no spoilers until filming begins in August. Until then, anything that claims to be a spoiler (like this) is just a fake.

Tennant

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR

Tennant Stuart wrote in message news:...

An insecure acceptance by Rachel to a marriage proposal that wasn't there to begin with, using a ring Joey picked of the floor that belongs to Ross. Sorry but it is pretty obvious it was a misunderstanding on Rachel's part and is not going to result in a Joey/Rachel marriage next season.

Well I for one hope to see more episodes like TOW Blackout or TOW Poker in this sitcom's final season instead of focusing on relationships - the afternoon soaps provide a hearty dose of the latter. A normal sitcom with a good and funny writing does not necessarily have to be boring you know.

Alhena88Sonny Blackalt.tv.friends

s p o i l e r

s
p
a
c
e
*
*
*
*
*
*

Even if Ross and Rachel do not get together, and Joey and Rachel do, the likelihood of them getting married in the next year is very very slim, so this is really no surprise. We all know that Joey is not going to pretend that he actually proposed to Rachel, and the confusion will be cleared up within the first episode.

What will continue past the first episode is Rachel questioning herself (and Ross and Joey and everybody else for that matter) as to why she was so quick to say "yes" to Joey if she has no feelings for him.

As for these stories being "leaked" or comments being made by actors/producers: does anyone actually expect them to tell the truth? Do you really think anyone involved in the show would want to let slip whatever information they might know? Is it possible that they say certain things to create more confusion, throw fans off the trail, or keep us guessing so we'll be sure to watch?

In article , [email] (Sonny Black) wrote:

S P O I L E R

S P A C E

S P O I L E R

S P A C E

The point is that if the characters do the obvious, there's no comedy.

Oh, I agree, especially for Phoebe. Let's have fewer romance stories.

Tennant

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR
Tennant StuartBryanalt.tv.friends

In article , [email] (Bryan) wrote:

Apart from the fact that in the past, IMDb news stories have been most unreliable, NBC representatives do *not* create or produce "Friends".

Not official at all.

Tennant Stuart

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR