Rachel's sister Jill

Aug 5, 20004 posts by 4 postersalt.tv.friends
4 posts

Reese is Ok, but for Rachel's sister Sarah Michelle Gellar would have been so much better. I think Jennifer and Sarah are quite similar. Daria.-

----- Mr. DeMartino: And why are we going to engage in simulated combat? Daria. Daria: Because no high school education is complete until you've chased your fellow students around the woods with toy guns?

Hellooooo!!! After getting drunk in Vegas, Daria Morgendorffer doodled cat whiskers on his/her face and miaowed this little lot at a statue...

Having just seen "Pleasantville" again: No, no, no.

Plus, to be honest, SMG gave Buffy an unnecessarily hard edge this season. And besides, I don't think she would fit into Friends at all - she's far better suited to drama than comedy.

Le gr�, go deo! Tina: The upholder of Angelicism - or something like that... -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!

Nah, I really don't think SMG would have done a better job than Reese Witherspoon. She did an excellent job, and a large majority enjoyed her character (or her acting rather), as opposed to Elle Mcpherson's boring Janine (funny how she called Chandler boring, there was nothing funny or interesting about her really). Besides, why would SMG appear on a show on a competing network? The WB wouldn't be too happy with that.

====== "Life is never without love" -Sheryl Crow

<A HREF="http://rainforest.care2.com/front.html/player58016">Join Care2.com's Race for the Rain Forest!</A>

Daria Morgendorffer wrote:

Reese Witherspoon was terrific. She actually managed to imbue that childish little tease with a grain of humanity. I wouldn't change a thing.