as in Chloe saying it to Ross in 315. Now here's my problem with that line: There's no way that what Ross does can be seen as dancing, if anything he's squirming uncomfortably on his chair/stool.
Yeah, I'm bored, playing Mario is only interesting for so long....
I guess Chloe has a loose interpretation of dancing? ;)
And this group is so dead lately. So, do you think Chandler ought to pay Phoebe $7000? Because at the end of TOW the Thumb, she says, "I'll give you $7000 if you never smoke again." Not "if you quit." And he *has* smoked since then. OTOH, she didn't say, "or else you have to give it back to me."
She just wanted to get him to dance, and she saw it was easy, when he said "I like this song" or sth like that. Saying "you're practically dancing already" was enough to convince him, as he was hardly thinking about anything at the time. ;)
Yes I do. But there can't be much debate about that, huh?
Another thing, since I'm obviously in the middle of re-watching S3: How come Rachel never admitted that Ross was right about Mark after all? We never saw him after TOW the tiny T-Shirt, where Rachel told him that it wasn't gonna happen. If he were "just a friend" as Rachel always insisted, he would have stuck around, wouldn't he?
He wasn't right about him! While R&R were a couple there was nothing going on with Rachel & Mark. Maybe Mark wanted more but Rachel didn't.
Rachel never appologised or really addressed the issue of giving her phone number to the guy in the bar or kissing the guy on the balcony while Ross was looking after 'their' baby.
"cookie dude" wrote in message news:3fe2efdf$0$19069$[email]...
Women never will admit that their man was right. They tell us that we are being unreasonably jealous instead of considering that we *might* actually understand another man better than they, a woman, do. But do I sound bitter? Noooooo.....
I'll bet Phoebe could really use that $7000 for her wedding now--and she seems to have gotten over her issues with tainted money.
Rachel admitting that Ross was right about something during that whole ugly time? Wasn't happening. The leitmotif was all how wrong Ross was, no?
Just saw 1.19 TOW the Monkey Gets Away again yesterday, and noticed a little parallel with TOW the Rumor (8.09):
Ross: Oh, no no no. Nono, this is just vintage Rachel. I mean, things just sort of happen around you. I mean, you're off in Rachel-land, doing your Rachel-thing, totally oblivious to people's monkeys, or to people's feelings... (1.09)
Will: I said it was typical. Typical of you, Rachel Green, Queen Rachel does whatever she wants in little Rachel land. (Does a fake hair flip.) (8.09)
This must have been one of their topics of discussion at the "I Hate Rachel" Club. It seems to me Ross even did a quick little fake hair flip, after "Rachel land," but maybe I imagined it (too lazy to check right now!).
So much has changed in this show. The worst part of it, it spoils watching the old stuff for me, as I can't seem to stop thinking about what all these great episodes eventually lead to :(
That's one of the things that could have been done in S5 or S6, when the focus was on M+C. Instead of pulling cheap stunts like a Vegas wedding or a flirtatious sister, some of this old stuff could have been brought up. They still could have done their sweeps routine, in that one of them finally freaks out and blows the other one off - this way people would be fonder (more fond?) of an reunion, if there's going to be one. (because they got to see these two are willing to work on their problems...) oh well.
(...)
I think he did the hair flip as well. It's been ages since I watched that ep though. Hey, let's make this the official reminiscing thread ;) Can you think of anything else worth mentioning?
The producers mention that in their commentary for TOW the embryos. Apparently they cast Ribisi without really having a role for him to play, so he made that one appearance as the random guy in the street and when the idea of Phoebe's brother came up they contacted him, telling him that they finally found a role for him
I know what you mean. I know I keep bringing this up, but here I go again: Phoebe used to be a person who never lied (and she made the best oatmeal-raisin cookies in the world!). Since then, she's become conniving, and she lies without giving it a second thought. :(
This would have been so much better, I agree. I guess the writers found it much easier to shovel in a boatload of "WE WERE ON A BREAK!" followed by withering stares.
I was thinking of something a couple of days ago, but now I forget what it was--I hate when it happens. I'm sure I'll think of something else, though.
Just think of last year's Thanksgiving episode when she instructs Joey on how to lie.
Listening to the commentary on the S3 DVDs was quite interesting, as David Crane said one of the outstanding things about Friends is that they go through with these storylines, they are daring enough to break up the couple that was pretty much the focus of the first three years etc. But on the other hand, he didn't seem to like seeing "his" characters suffer like that. Martha Kauffman really annoyed me with her "they're so much better when they fight" - especially since it was like every other sentence
Since I read the first interview with Marta Kauffman I didn't like her. She was the one to say "these fans of the show should get real friends" or something to that affect when asked about the hardcore fans. Also she took her private matters onto the show, she insisted on the scene where Phoebe makes Ross apologize to the cat in 402 even though nearly everybody else was against it (her mother had just died).
Yeah, I don't really understand why people liked their "big" fight in S9 which caused Rachel to move out. The storyline around it was really stupid and it seemed poorly acted, at least compared with the infamous TOT morning after. But it is a general observation of mine that Marta Kauffman brings hardly any value to the audio commentaries in general, she seems to be talking about herself most of the time (on the S2 DVDs she goes on about how the OJ trial affected her to an extent she couldn't concentrate on the shoot at hand...), whereas Kevin S. Bright and David Crane do share some interesting anecdotes/insights - Kevin S. Bright even causes the first *bleep* in Friends history :)
Meanwhile, I came across something. Monica asking Rachel if she'd be a surrogate is kind of weird in retrospect, huh? I mean, not only did Rachel get pregnant but also Monica can't seem to get pregnant and is now looking into adoption. What are the odds? :)
People around here weren't too happy when that interview came out (I think it was between S8 and S9)
The only part about it that bothered me was how Phoebe and Rachel forced Ross to apologize to the cat, Phoebe even giving this speech about losing a parent and then she goes with what Ross has said all along, that the cat needs to be given back. *humph*
IMO, it was an "we can't think of anything else and have 1.5 more seasons to kill, so we'll rekindle the J+R thing and for that we have to move her back over to Joey" fight ;)
He explained how Ross' way of giving the finger came about, saying they needed a way to say "*bleep* you" and getting it past the censors :)
I'm out of ideas now, except I propose S4 be called "The Ernie & Bert show", because Chandler and Joey are just like them in that season :)
Oh, I get it. I thought you meant he caused someone to actually say something that they had to bleep out. . . .
Hmm, I wonder if MK cried the night KB came up with that. ;)
Is Joey Ernie?
While watching TOW Phoebe's Dad, I thought of what you'd written regarding knowing how things change in future eps. That whole bit with the grandmother saying P's dad is the guy who knocked up her mom and stole her Gremlin is ruined by the whole Teri Garr thing in S3/4. :(
Don't I remember someone daring Lisa Kudrow to swear in her scene alone with the triplets? I think it was Matthew Perry
muahaha... :)
I dunno, but Chandler seems more like a Bert kind of guy, doesn't he? So yeah, Joey is Ernie then
How do you mean? Meanwhile, I watched the episode that is completely ruined to me because of the above, TOW Ross's wedding. Up until then, everything was cool, but all of a sudden there seems to be nothing but tension between Ross and Emily, and Chandler and Monica get together, which was the first step in removing the best buds idea from the show :( I can't say I fully enjoyed any season since then, even though many people rate S5 so highly.
Another thing I did notice was in the "morning's here" episode is, that Chandler's bed room can't be where we see it since there's a wall there, the wall we see in Joey's room when we look into it from the living room doesn't seem to exist and I wonder if the "morning's here" guy has moved, else Rachel should hear him now as well, don't you think?
My son loves _Sesame Street_, so I've been watching again. In some ways they're both kind of Ernie-ish--Bert doesn't have that great a sense of humor. Plus he reads books about oatmeal and stares at paperclips. But Chandler's more responsible, so he's more Bert-like in that respect.
The TG episodes took motherhood away from Lily--and made it so she'd never been "knocked up." Are we supposed to think the grandmother was lying about that, or that Lily lied to her mother? Grrrr. I wish they'd never done that. :(
Yes, IKWYM about the London eps. :(
Yes, there are definitely problems with the layout of the building, in that ep and others. I've also wondered about the "morning's here" guy. Also, in that episode, Rachel thought the apartment was horrible, but apparently it's just fine with her now. And remember how mean Rachel was to Joey in that episode?
This won't leave me alone until I find out where I got that from, which means I'll have to go through all my Friends stuff, which is way too much anyway. I have a suspicion it's from 715a though
Yeah, and also Bert sometimes has this disapproving quality about him, doesn't he? Ernie just seems more easygoing in general
Ah, I see. The whole story arc about Phoebe and her parents is disgraceful IMHO. It only ever came up in the middle of a season and was never given the importance it deserved. The way her father was revealed was shameful, if you think about how many episodes these people can waste on Ross not being okay with Joey dating Rachel for example, which everybody knew anyway. This is quite an important part of the character and even when this arc was explored she was second fiddle to the others...
Many people I've spoken to seem to have stopped watching Friends around then, especially from my English friends.
Good point about Rachel bitching about the apartment. But since it's her you could probably explain this away with laziness, at least this way she doesn't have to go looking for a place of her own and she can drop Emma off at Monica's or Ross's without having to go all that far. Not saying she would, because she seems very strongly attached to Emma, but the possibility is there.
When Phoebe gets married, I wonder if she'll stick to their Maid of Honour arrangements. Hopefully Monica would drive Phoebe nuts with all her wedding suggestions, enough to make her dump Mike and runs off to find David. :)