Folks, some bozo has put a crucial spoiler in the thread about Rachel's dress. Don't read it unless you want a substantial portion of the finale leaked for you.
AAA.. BIG SPOILER ALERT
May 12, 2002, 11:09 AM ET16 posts by 12 posters
16 posts
"abrahammy" wrote in message news:DAvD8.1701$X%[email]...
Unfortunately this warning came to late for me :(
Hope you saved some others though...
Andr�
Umm.. www.friendstv.com has the fact that Ross has a ring in his pocket in the summary of the finale, so it isn't that big of a spoiler....
LOGAN "Andr� Knoche" wrote in message news:abm9rv$4q6$[email]...
finale
No, it doesn't have that in the summary.
/Faskil.
Umm..it is right on the main page..with the link to the episode embedded in it
"Faskil [BNG]" wrote in message news:onAD8.6128$[email]...
in
"Logan Culwell" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:C5AD8.36953$WR1.29509@sccrnsc01...
Can you imagine that there are people who want to wait and see what happens and not read everything about it on a post in Usenet?
Andr�
"Logan Culwell" wrote in message news:C5AD8.36953$WR1.29509@sccrnsc01...
spoiler....
It is a huge spoiler. A lot of people do not want any summary at all, and this is kind of a big tidbit. I read spoilers myself, and I can verify that it is true, but folks have the right not to have this *deliberately* blabbed. (Mistakes happen, but this is a lulu.) Please do not do this.
I'm with you Logan.....the thing about the ring comes straight from TVGUIDE.com. It's not like they are trying to keep it a secret. Cheers JD
"Logan Culwell" wrote in message news:C5AD8.36953$WR1.29509@sccrnsc01... Umm.. www.friendstv.com has the fact that Ross has a ring in his pocket in the summary of the finale, so it isn't that big of a spoiler....
LOGAN "Andr� Knoche" wrote in message news:abm9rv$4q6$[email]...
finale
"JD" wrote in message news:7oVD8.68931$[email]...
And a lot of people on this newsgroup are STILL trying to avoid knowing anything about future episodes. That IS a spoiler - a big one, and it requires spoiler space. They put the kiss in the NBC trailers, too, and it ruined that moment for a lot of people who were very upset. Lurk here longer until you understand how important this is to a large number of our members.
Jeez..take a CHILL!!
"abrahammy" wrote in message news:uLXD8.8341$[email]...
"JD" wrote in message news:7oVD8.68931$[email]...
And a lot of people on this newsgroup are STILL trying to avoid knowing anything about future episodes. That IS a spoiler - a big one, and it requires spoiler space. They put the kiss in the NBC trailers, too, and it ruined that moment for a lot of people who were very upset. Lurk here longer until you understand how important this is to a large number of our members.
"Andr?Knoche" wrote in message news:...
For God's sake, it's a TV SHOW....
"fsbfgvsx" wrote in message news:[email]...
news:...
Rachel's
finale
Really? Thanks for telling me, I thought it was some kind of dessert.
In article , [email] (fsbfgvsx) writes:
Just for you, today's FAQ soundbite:
Q16: Some people seem to get too much "into" the show... they take it way too seriously! It's just a TV program... shouldn't they just relax?
A16: No... because "too seriously" is an awfully subjective phrase (not to mention that everyone *realizes* that it's a TV show, so there's no need to remind anyone :> ).
This newsgroup is here for the purpose of discussing *all* aspects of "Friends." That includes character motivations, past continuity, possible developments based on previous characterization... i.e. anything to do with the characters and the show, within the bounds of the fiction in which they've been set.
There's a very broad range of discussions going on here, and chances are you're not going to be interested in all of them. You might even find some that you personally think are silly or a waste of time. No problem... but do be polite and just *ignore* the ones you're not interested in. All the topics here are being discussed for one reason... the posters who participate in them think they're enjoyable and interesting. No one appreciates being patronized and told what should or should not be considered fun, and anyone who tries is just setting him or herself up to be flamed or (more likely) ignored from then on. After all, if a person has no respect for what others are talking about, he or she isn't likely to get any respect in return.
To summarize... be tolerant. If someone is digging deeper into the show than *you* prefer too... let them, and go on to a discussion that you enjoy.
And, for good measure, from "The Sarcastic Netiquette Guide for alt.tv.friends" (http://members.aol.com/jamess1889/net_guide.html):
30.If someone is referring to the characters as if they were real (i.e. "I love Phoebe" instead of "I love Lisa Kudrow's character Phoebe"), then they obviously *believe* the characters are real. Remind them that the show is make-believe and that the actors are just pretending. Be stern, so they don't forget again.
"abrahammy" wrote in message news:...
Thanks for the warning Claire but ironically I got spoiled by this thread. :(
Priya
[email] (p r i y a) wrote in message news:...
Same here. Hopefully, the show still has some something in store for us who don't read spoilers, but have been accidentally spoiled several times. :(
ahah so did i.... that thread you're talking about isn't even on my server anymore : (
berry : )
"p r i y a" wrote in message news:[email]...
news:...
finale
:(