who was fist singled out as a star

Dec 1, 2003, 10:38 AM ET20 posts by 11 postersalt.tv.friends
20 posts
Allanalt.tv.friends

Coming to the end of this second-to-none sitcom, I think most of us agree, that the most successfull persons among the six with regards to other on-screen projects, have been JA and MP. But when the show started back in 1994, I think I recall DS being the first who everyone talked about as the one with the greatest potential. My own feeling is that this was because back then DS was allowed to portray Ross as a much more "likeable" guy, toning down his nerdy habits and jealousy issues and instead underlining his romantic and sensitive nature. But how do you remember this?

Kind regards

Allan

ChristopherAllanalt.tv.friends

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:38:30 +0100, "Allan" wrote:

Well CCA was a B movie actress before it started, so I guess that makes her a kind of star as all of the movies she's done since joining Friends have still been B movies.

Christopher "Kites rise highest against the wind - not with it." Winston Churchill

In article , [email] (Christopher) wrote:

CC's movies from before "Friends" made over a hundred million dollars in *profit*, and that's back when $100m was still a lot of money.

Since then, her movies have made far more profit than all of the movies of the other five cast-members added together.

Tennant Stuart

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR

Tennant Stuart performed this cute little number:

Ya, because she was in the Scream trilogy. And I'm willing to bet lots of money that 95% of the audience would not have cared if they had casted someone else for her role, it was only a supporting character. I think it's between JA and MP, the former with all her romantic comedies _and_ Office Space, which you just have to love, MP mainly because of TWNY

you know... there isn't a part of that sentence that I don't need explained?! http://fear.mybigmouth.com

In article , cookie dude wrote:

It doesn't matter.

Millions of people put bums on seats for CC's movies, far more than all the bums on seats for the other five cast-members added together.

She was *not* a supporting character, her name came above the title.

People say she was a supporting character because she had third billing, but they're overlooking that the main cast lists were all in alphabetic order, and the word COX comes after ARQUETTE & CAMPBELL.

All that counts in Hollywood is Oscars and profits.

They're all equal on Oscars, and CC is way ahead on profits.

Tennant

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:19:30 GMT, Tennant Stuart wrote:

What makes you think they were going to see CC, they could have gone to see Neve Campbell.

She didn't carry the movie like an A list actor or actress can.

No, all her movies where she was the sole leading actress have not made a big profit, infact 'Shaking the tree' was a turkey that hardly made any money at all.

Christopher "Kites rise highest against the wind - not with it." Winston Churchill

In article , [email] (Christopher) wrote:

I don't know what they were going to see, you don't know what they were going to see, Neve Campbell doesn't know what they were going to see.

All that matters is bums on seats (and Oscars).

That's ridiculous. Take her out of the movie and it falls apart. To fault her for not carrying the movie is simply saying that she wasn't the only star in the movie - well, some movies are like that. But for assessing status, all that matters is being a leading player in films which make a lot of money, or Oscars.

You can say that about all 6 of them, but CC is still far out in front.

Tennant

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR

Tennant Stuart performed this cute little number:

Yes it does. There's a difference between going to the cinema to watch a movie and going to the cinema to watch an actor/actress. You're suggesting the latter, while it is clearly the former. If I were to ask around my circle of friends, they'd all know what Friends is, but the majority wouldn't have a clue as to who Courteney Cox-Arquette is. Furthermore, Neve Campbell had to be talked into doing Scream 3, she didn't want to do it first. That directing guy said he wouldn't do it without her, because of the importance of her character. You can't seriously argue that CC's role mattered as much, can you? She could have easily been replaced.

She was lucky enough to be in Ace Ventura and the Scream Trilogy, but the main stars of these films were others, she was just from the "Olympic standing there team". Her contribution to these movies was notably smaller than those of the main actors. If I were to put your standard up for the others, then Charlie's Angels was an MLB film and everybody who went to watch it went to see him.

you know... there isn't a part of that sentence that I don't need explained?! http://fear.mybigmouth.com

In article , cookie dude wrote:

She was still a leading player, whatever motives you assume for going.

I disagree, but that's irrelevant, she was billed in a leading role.

Not true. MLB was billed in a *supporting* role for the CA movies.

Tennant

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR

Tennant Stuart wrote:

She may have been a leading player based on screen time, but hardly anyone except for a bunch of Friends nutters went to see Scream because of her. People went because the movies were considered cool and they could have got away with replacing every character except for maybe Neve Campbell and David Arquette AIUI - never watched the 2nd and 3rd one

If she's such a good and successful actress, how come all she ever gets casted for these days is slightly better than your average b-movie, whereas JA and MP get casted for one mainstream flick after the other? (Bruce Almighty, that film with Ben Stiller, The whole ten yards....)

you know... there isn't a part of that sentence that I don't need explained?! http://fear.mybigmouth.com

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:33:20 GMT, Tennant Stuart wrote:

Not so. Her most successful movie has been the Scream movies, and she was but one leading actress in them.

Christopher "Kites rise highest against the wind - not with it." Winston Churchill

In article , [email] (Christopher) wrote:

She was still a leading actress in very profitable movies.

Tennant

(_ _)( ___)( \( )( \( ) /__\ ( \( )(_ _) Greetings to family )( )__) ) ( ) ( /(__)\ ) ( )( friends & neighbours (__) (____)(_)\_)(_)\_)(__)(__)(_)\_) (__) @argonet.co.uk & MCR

Courteny certainly seemed to be the most visible before the show began. The Springsteen video, and her character on Family Ties, and then as someone points out, the Ace Ventura movie.

Lisa Kudrow was of course visible before the show, in her role as the waitress on Mad About You. But I'm not sure how visible she was beyond those who watched that show.

The only other of the six that I can remember from before was Mathew Perry, who was in a show or two. But I'm not sure if I recognized him from the previous show, or needed a comment to point that out.

Michael

"Michael Black" wrote in message news:bqg34i$hft$[email]...

Perry,

Yes I remember him in Beverly Hills 90210. He was guest-starring in a couple of episodes. Those were the days ...ahh...

KathyMichael Blackalt.tv.friends

Lisa was on an episode of "Cheers" as a brunette playing a character that was in the acting class Woody attended. The most recognized character when the series first started probably was Courteney. She definitely had the most sitcom experience! ~~~ Kathy

"Michael Black" wrote in message news:bqg34i$hft$[email]...

agree,

in

the

his

someone

Perry,

RickMichael Blackalt.tv.friends

"Michael Black" wrote in message news:bqg34i$hft$[email]...

agree,

in

the

his

someone

Perry,

DS had a recurring role the year before on NYPD Blue that lasted four or five episodes. When Friends first came on, he and CCA were the only people I recognized. I remembered Courtney from Family Ties.

phlossyChristopheralt.tv.friends

She was in 3000 miles to Graceland.. which was an ok movie... I didnt consider it a B movie.

"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...

agree,

in

the

his

Christopherphlossyalt.tv.friends

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:36:48 -0500, "phlossy" wrote:

3MTG was a turkey that sank without trace didn't do the casts careers any favours, and only just covered its budget.

Christopher "Kites rise highest against the wind - not with it." Winston Churchill
lkng4chubsAllanalt.tv.friends

The earliest movie I have ever seen anyone in was Courtney in "Ace Ventura: Pet Detective." Whether there was other's before her or other movies, I am not sure. "Allan" wrote in message news:3fcb606d$0$24838$[email]...

his

Marita BakkenAllanalt.tv.friends

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:38:30 +0100, "Allan" wrote:

Judging by Matthew's comments in the Oprah-interview, I'd say David. He received an Emmy-nod for his work in the first season, and he was the first one with the big movie ("The Pallbearer") with Gwyneth Paltrow. Courteney was the most famous person before the show started, but David was the breakout star.

~Marita [email]