Mainly a heads up for Christopher on atf
As you probably know ITV4 has been showing Dream On (around midnight most weekdays).
Anyway, CC's episode 'Come & Knock On Our Door' is due soon according to Digiguide.
There's bit of confusion over the exact date though, as the episode number given in IMDB doesn't match that in epguide. IMDB numbers the above episode S3-9, but calls it S3-10.
S3-9 is on 12/1 at 11.30pm
S3-10 is on 14/1 at 0.25am (I assume that's it, though Digiguide omits the ep no.)
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:49:43 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
What day? If it's in the week she can sod off, as I have to be up early for work. BTW Courteney is in the remake of the [USA] Mean Machine. I was in Warrington's Staples on Wednesday, and they had a Sony VAIO TX series going with the preview in a continuous loop, god has she got big tits now, bit droopy but twice as big as she had on Friends, wonder if she's had surgery.
12th is a Monday.
You don't have even a VCR?
No, just a baby...
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:00:53 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
Big miss then, back to normal at work by then, could be earlies as in 7.30am start. :-(
As it's on digital you can only tape the program as you watch it, so as I'll be in bed I can't tape it. Don't think you can set it on the timer, you can IF the VCR has a scart lead, but I don't think ours has. :-(
Maybe she had em done before. If they get any bigger they'll match her big ears. :-)
I'll be recording it to DVD.
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:12:20 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
Not got round to getting a recordable DVD yet, �80 at Maplins.
I assume you do have a DVD *player*? :)
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:42:22 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
Yes, how else am I to watch porn. LOL Seriously, it's only a standard DVD player not one you can record with.
Well, I recorded it, and CC looked unbelievable in black undies! :)
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:56:12 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
I was flicking through the freeview channels as I got sick of waiting for some air head to get the right answer to ftn's 'quiznight' question, and I saw the relevant part of the episode, yes Courteney looked quite tastetee THEN, however time and the aging process have moved on, and she doesn't look as good now.
Why - have you seen her in black undies *recently*? :)
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:39:36 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
Narr, best ask David that. :-) But she's no longer in the full bloom as she was then. Checking the internet movie database, she made it in 1992, or 4 years before the Hollywood huckster set his sights on her on the set of Scream. Or she was 28 when she appeared in those black undies.
Good gawd, Chris....you are so incredibly shallow.....you write off a woman because she ages. ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
I thought most of his negative comments are because he considers her husband a dickhead...
You're right about that, Paul, but Chris said she looked "tasty" as a young woman and then with this comment, "time and the aging process have moved on, and she doesn't look as good now." In another post, he's replaced CCA with Tara Reid as his "object of obsession", so it's pretty clear that Chris doesn't find women over 35 appealing or attractive, which makes him incredibly shallow. ~~~ Kathy
"Paul Hyett" wrote in message news:L1$[email]...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:47:30 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
"object of obsession" ???????????????????????????????????
Narr, just picky. :->
Picky??? Haven't you heard that "beggers can't be choosey?" ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:18:01 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
Yep, why have meat loaf if you were able to afford pheasant.
Yep, but if you recall I also said if I was rich enough to be able to moved in those circles, which in that case you could afford to be picky. :-p
Obviously, David WAS able to "afford" pheasant since he IS the one who proposed to Courteney and she DID accept and they DID get married. But, you're probably going to say that she was the major wage earner in the relationship and that may well be true, so if you are so convinced that David is "meatloaf" and a "dickhead", Courteney clearly didn't see him that way. Her bank account would have been able to open doors for anyone, but looks like it wasn't the money that brought these two together. She finds him sexy, attractive and desirable. You're just pissed because you know she wouldn't find you either of those things. Even hypothetically, if you WERE able to afford to run in those "circles", what makes you think Courteney or Tara or anyone else you're fixated on these days would even give you a second glance?
Christopher, you really, REALLY need to stop reading those rag newspapers and magazines. They're rotting your brain!!!! ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:28:40 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
It was a metaphor.
Courteney was probably on the rebound from Michael Keaton.
It was a metaphor. And Hollywood considers him a 'dickhead', Paul's comment, not mine. And she IS the 'major wage earner'.
Unless that person was richer or more powerful then her. Right, David said and did all the right things, after all he is an actor. And I bet he was playing the role of his life, to bad they don't give out Oscars for them.
For now.
Maybe, maybe not, neither you or Courteney know me.
Once again I told you K, 99.99% of the time I don't think of Courteney, Tara, or any other Hollywood or woman.
The three biggest aphrodisiacs in the world are money, power and fame, you have enough of them and you become sought after. :-)
They are light hearted and entertaining, as is the series 'Fabulous life of ' that TMF show's over here.
You don't marry & have a kid with someone while on rebound - you have a few weeks of sex...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:34:29 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
Yep that's what Courteney was doing during Scream 2, unfortunatly the sex David was having with Courteney wasn't enough for him, so he banged a stripper as well.
If Tara Reid is who I think she is, surely she's over 35 (and very attractive).
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:32:38 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
She's 31.
Perhaps it wasn't her I was thinking of then. What does Tara Reid do?
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:03:48 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
The usual things a woman in her profession does, act in movies, go on photo shoots, develop a career outside of movies, go to parties, travel, have lots of sex. :-)
You ALWAYS have to throw "sex" into the mix, don't you? Tara Reid is a semi-celebrity who has probably taken her career to the height she feels comfortable with and whether or not she's having "lots of sex" is her business, not yours or anyone elses. You need to seek professional help for this obsession you develop for American actresses. It's not healthy. ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
I miss the days when *I* was the recipient of such comments... :)
Of course, all the US sitcoms I used to enjoy have ended their runs, and Joey is the *only* current one I actually watch.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:10:49 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
Yes.
Gee lighten up Mom.
Well they are better looking then British actresses I have seen.
She is SO not over 35! ~~~ Kathy
"Paul Hyett" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 07:10:27 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:
Err, from what I can gather nearly all of Hollywood considers him to be 'a dickhead'. :-)
#1, I've never read anything about anyone in Hollywood thinking David Arquette is a dickhead.....I think you're wishful thinking, and #2, what is a "consider"? ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:19:29 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
Well that's understandable, as you have said numerous times here you never read the National Enquirer. :-)
Don't you mean 'considers'.
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:12:27 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
Yep, unlike you women who got for personality ect us men prefer to see the wrapping all fresh and crease free. ;-)
Geeze, Chris.....oink much? ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:20:26 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
Eh ???????????????
"Yep, unlike you women who got for personality ect us men prefer to see the wrapping all fresh and crease free. ;-)"
With that statement, you've proven to all of us beyond a doubt that you are a class "A" P-I-G!!! ~~~ Kathy
"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:29:57 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:
A pig, me, narr, you must have me mistaken for someone else. :-)
She does look good in it, but then she didn't have arms like a weightlifter back then like she did in later Friends eps.
The IMDB classes this as ep 3.9, whereas it's ep 3.10 on Epguides.com I guess it depends whether the opening two-parter are classed as a single ep or two.
Dom