does anyone know? Obviously Bruce Willis and Brad Pitt would be more than let's say Maggie Wheeler, but do we have any idea the range of money they get?
how much do guest stars get paid?
Jun 3, 2002, 3:51 PM ET30 posts by 12 posters
30 posts
"SHNOCODY" wrote in message news:[email]...
let's
Ok, the information I've got is not 100% sure but I read somewhere that Bruce Willis was signed for 1M $ per episode he starred in (that would make a nice three million dollars) but he donated it all to charity of some kind. The info was in german (which is not my native language) and about the time the episode was originally aired so my memory could play tricks with it. And some of the guest stars play in the show because they are invited by one of the members cast, so they usually do it for less money as expected, as we could see with B. Crystal and Robin Williams in the 3rd season - they were suppossebly (supposebly?-how the hell do you write this word?) invited by Lisa kudrow after "Analyze this", B. Willis - by M. Perry after "the whole 9 yards", and let's guess who has the closest relations with B. Pitt and could invite him to the show?
B.N.
make
kind.
time
one
we
9
could
Don't know what they were paid, but adding a few to your list: David Arquette by Courteney Cox. And Jon Lovitz by Lisa Kudrow
In article , [email] (Branko Norwisz) usenetted:
I really can't believe this. That would mean paying him as much as one of the show's full-time stars. I can't believe they'd have the budget for that.
wg
wrote in message news:adgnvs$35b$[email]...
I would be pretty angry if I was one of the six if I heard that a guest star was getting what they are getting only 8 years of negotiating.
Sofya
In article , "Branko Norwisz" writes:
"supposedly"
"LyfordIII" wrote in message news:[email]...
Just to clarify the issue: supposedly means it "is generally accepted" which seams to be roughly what you meant here. Supposably means, "it is possible to imagine."
The difference is obviously subtle, which is supposedly why people use the two words incorrectly. In fact, supposably is so often misused that many people are under the impression that it isn't a word. Even the MS Outlook spellchecker doesn't recognize it. However, it is in the Oxford College, Webster's, and Readers Digest Great Encyclopedic dictionaries.
May we all say it at once: WHO CARES!! Who are you.. Ross?! At least it wasn't dinosaurs...
LOGAN "David Buehrle" wrote in message news:a1XK8.464$[email]...
which
possible
Logan Culwell wrote:
I care, so shut up...
Andr�
I care! I've been wondering about this for years. Ever since Joey brought it up in one of the episodes.
Sofya
"Logan Culwell" wrote in message news:nkYK8.102224$[email]...
the
many
Outlook
College,
In article , [email] (David Buehrle) usenetted:
Nice joke.
wg
[email] wrote in message news:...
That's what I thought as well, in the same vein as "did you know gullible isn't even in the dictionary?" However, go see: http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=supposably
Sure enough, there it is.
That said, it is hard to imagine that those who actually say "supposably" intend to use that word as opposed to "supposedly," rather like those who use "irregardless" when they should use "regardless."
Scott
"David Buehrle" wrote in message news:...
^^^^^
Seams means the plural of "the line formed by sewing together pieces of cloth, leather, or the like." Seems means "to appears to be" which seems to be roughly what you meant here. :)
Sorry, I could't let it go under these "corrective" circumstances. :)
Scott
In article , [email] (Scott Letteney) wrote:
You misspelt "couldn't". :)
Tennant
"Tennant Stuart" wrote in message news:[email]...
I think you made it through your response without an error. A gold star goes to you Tennant. (Only three words--that made it easier, I'm sure.
In article , "David Buehrle" wrote:
Ta fish.
Tennant
"Tennant Stuart" wrote in message news:[email]...
Are you sure its not "misspelled"? :)
Sofya
"Sofya" wrote in message news:adpecd$9tj$[email]...
of
seems
English version. (It's optional.)
In article , "Sofya" wrote:
Both spellings are permissible. But it's "it's" not "its". :)
Tennant
"Tennant Stuart" wrote in message news:[email]...
LOL I was about to respond with something like, "Its what is not misspelled?" You beat me to the punch. :-))
In article , "David Buehrle" wrote:
Thanks. The easy way to remember it is that "its" is spelt the same way as "hers" and "ours" and "yours"; while "it's" is "it is".
Tennant
"Tennant Stuart" wrote in message news:[email]...
So "it's mine" means "It is mine." So how would you use "its" then? See now you got me all confused...lol.
Sofya
"Sofya" wrote in news:ae80u3$pd5$[email]:
'Its' denotes ownership, or a property of <blank>. For example, if you had a long-haird cat, you could say that 'its hair is long;' you use it in the same way that you'd use 'hers' or 'his' ('his hair is long' and 'her hair is long' make sense). 'It's,' as mentioned above, means 'it is;' if you replaced it in the sentence above, it would make no sense ('it is hair is long').
In article , "Sofya" wrote:
You use "its" when something belongs to an object, such as...
The car squealed its tyres.
Tennant
"Tennant Stuart" wrote in message news:[email]...
I think you spelled it *that* way on purpose. You can't stick an ancient city on a car, much less find more than one Tyre.
In article , "David Buehrle" wrote:
PHOEBE: Oh, you Americans always butcher the English language.
Tennant
"David Buehrle" wrote in message news:oFcM8.3748$[email]...
which
:)
LOL. Thanks guys, you really made my day. Nothing like a good laugh before going to a tedious job... :)
Sofya
Tennant Stuart wrote in message news:...
Damn, Tennant, you got me! I was trying to be so accurate! Supposably I could call you on "misspelt" versus "misspelled" but you'd probably tell me it's an English versus American thing. :)
In article , [email] (Scott Letteney) wrote:
No spell-checker?
Grin.
Tennant
"Scott Letteney" wrote in message news:[email]...
news:...
which
possible
Good catch!