Have Brad and Jen split up?

Today at work a woman told me that Brad and Jen have slit up-yes Kathy I do talk to other women besides you, and that it was in the papers, I never saw it, so have you lot in America seen anything? It'd probably make the BBC 10pm news if they had, but zip nothing up to now. Not even the national Enquirer has reported it, BUT I don't get to see it till weekend, and this weeks is Christmas, so it'll be Monday before I can have a look. The last NE showed Brad and Jen walking a way distance apart, and Jen's not been happy with Brad getting very pally with Angelina.

Christopher +++++++++++ "Never take anything for granted."

Benjamin Disraeli

In message , Christopher writes

I've seen this mentioned in the Sun, the Mail and the Express.

It appears to be speculation arising from the fact that they cancelled Brad's birthday bash at a top London restaurant due to the unexpected death of one of Jen's closest friends last week. Added to the fact that she was looking upset when she got off the plane after returning to the US and was not wearing her wedding ring, which she apparently *never* takes off, like they would know. Finally Brad is desperate to start a family but Jen is too busy filming 7 movies, in a "desperate bid to get her film career off the ground".

From all this conclusive "evidence" they've put 2 and 2 together, whether they have actually come up with 4 or 5, remains to be seen.

Chris, as long as you continue to rely upon the National Enquirer as your source for reliable news in the U.S., then I cannot waste my breath arguing with you.

It means NOTHING that she was seen not wearing her wedding ring. I take my wedding rings off as soon as I get home and put them in my jewelry chest to keep them from getting damaged and yes, I do go out sometimes (to the market, etc.) without my wedding ring on. It certainly does not mean that my husband and I are "feuding" or having problems. It just means that I didn't think to put it on.

Papparazzi have a unique "talent" of taking the most unflattering pictures of couples like Brad and Jen and then caption them as "trouble in paradise" or something equally nonsensical. ~~~ Kathy

"Christopher" wrote in message news:[email]...

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:27:07 -0500, "Kathy" wrote:

Ah-hem Kathy my sweet, I said "Not even the national Enquirer has reported it", AND **BEFORE** that, Today at work a woman told me that Brad and Jen have slit up...and that it was in the papers. The papers meaning our national press. As you have mentioned the NE gets it's stories second hand. But the principal source apart from one of my work colleges was national newspapers, who's sources are places like Reuters.

That well be true, but Jens not been happy with Angelina, and they have the usual hollywoodland thespian marriage problem, as in hubby want's to start a family, and wifey who is on a movie career roll, and wifey knows that 9 months pregnant and babies could be the kiss of death for her rising movie star career.

True, but it sells copy, and that's what counts in the newspaper or NE business.

Christopher +++++++++++ "Never take anything for granted."

Benjamin Disraeli

Seems logical that news would be available first-hand in the U.S. instead of the U.K. IF it was true and since I've not seen anything about it on reliable programs or internet news sources, I'm not going to say it's more than rumour and gossip.

Not true. Look at Catherine Zeta-Jones. Just had a baby and is still making great movies. Julia Roberts had twins recently and do you think that's going to be the kiss of death for her movie career? I seriously doubt it..... Kate Hudson...same. Reese Witherspoon....same. ~~~ Kathy

You two just stop it...

Meet up, get a room and get it over and done with

:-P

On 23 Dec 2004 20:51:58 GMT, [email] (PooKooHoo) wrote:

Errr bad idea, i.e. me having sex with Kathy. As she said once we'd both probably end up killing each other, and I don't mean by having too much sex. ;-)

Christopher +++++++++++ "Never take anything for granted."

Benjamin Disraeli

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:35:11 -0800, "Kathy" wrote:

Yeah seems like that over here as well.

Catherine Zeta Douglas and Julia Roberts are both top line actresses-well Catherine thinks she is. Catherine is also married to the Douglas clan, Julia is there at the top by merit as she has more x factor screen presence then Catherine will ever have, and who just got lucky with who she slept with. Kate Hudson is Goldie Hawns daughter, and is also part of an A list hollywoodland clan. Resse Witherspoon is a lot younger then Jen, and is far a better more versatile actress. Jen's an ok actress with a limited ability-as is Courteney. But Jen's not in the same legue as Julia for box office appeal, so Jen has to hang in their or else she's history, and a baby would make her so, plus Jens not getting any younger.

Christopher +++++++++++ "Never take anything for granted."

Benjamin Disraeli

She's worried about being left destitute living on the 'mere pittance' she made from Friends, then?

On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:32:17 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:

Ooooo, very droll, we can see Paul Hyett has started on the Christmas sherry already. Seriously, Jen might have loads of money, but she also wants to be a 'movie star', and being known just as 'Rachael Green' isn't going to make it happen.

Christopher +++++++++++ "Never take anything for granted."

Benjamin Disraeli