If I were Jennifer's marriage counselor.

This is what I would do. I would ask both Jennifer and Brad to sit down with their attorneys and write a contract between themselves and the bank to withhold a large part of their estate, and holdings. This would not effect anything except spending accounts, and none of those which are employed to business ventures or investments requiring flow for profit. This would only effect personal spending accounts. I would figure that either one of them would have 10 or 20 million set asside as a fun money account. How they get it out works by writing a specific number of sentences, in a specific fashion, with a specific set of meanings. The mind controls the body, and the mind can be trained to control your feelings, and perspective of reality. If this wasn't true there wouldn't be anything like a suicide bomber anywhere. Somewhere within thier own mind that individual has convince themself to believe that they'd live through it, diety, religion, etc doesn't matter. Now, if a person can do something that stupid, a person can convince themselves, or give themselves the perspective of choice. In a relationship, that can take advantage of the excitement and desires of the very beginning of a relationship. My only point is that religion, any of the major religions are instruction booklets and following the instructions is enough that by looking at the past, has filled graveyards with individuals based upon rituals defined in those tutorials. So, don't think about religion, but there is something to how it works, and why it works. The reason is simple, practice makes perfect. They read this instructions and the instructions tell them to read the instructions again, and keep reading the instructions. The instructions tell them to meditate on specific aspects or suggest that they would choose something to meditate on. Meditation is simply repeating a simply memorized writing over and over and focusing on it. This with daily prayer, has worked for Buddhists, Christians, Jews, Moslems, Hindus, and there's a long list of others you can find at a Scientology Web Site. I don't perscibe religion. I'm perscribing that you write sentences to replace meditation and prayer, or any other form of ritual. Why is simple, you do have to keep your mind on what you are writing to write it. Meditation allows the mind to wonder into whatever the imagination can ponder. But, like them you are going to reprogram your thinking. Unlike them you will pick and choose to best get what you really want out of the relationship, and enjoy what you always looked forward to in having a relationship. No rows, no columns, just one sentence to the next, end to end on college ruled paper, and 1000 of each.

For Brad: 1. I married the most beautiful woman in the world.

For Jennifer: 1. I married the most handsom man in the world.

For Brad: 2. I know I can't get tired of looking at Jennifer.

For Jennifer: 2. I know I can't get tired of looking at Brad.

For Brad: 3. I always want Jennifer to be happy.

For Jennifer: 3. I always want Brad to be happy.

For Brad: 4. I will do whatever I have to too keep Jennifer happy.

For Jennifer: 4. I will do whatever I have to too keep Brad Happy.

Now, you are starting to see the idea behind what is substantial in how you need to reprogram your thinking. A habit of thinking can start with dirty socks on the floor, or a dirty garbage can. Very simply you don't like something, and instead of just stating it, you internalize it. If it is one sided, then one person seems to do all of the complaining.

For Brad: 5. Can't solve a problem unless I know what it is.

For Jennifer: 5. Can't solve a problem unless I know what it is.

For Brad: 6. Kill senseless negative thinking about Jennifer, ignorance is bliss.

For Jennifer: 6. Kill senseless negative thinking about Brad, ignorance is bliss.

For Brad: 7. Solve the little problems to prevent them from becoming bigger ones.

For Jennifer: 7. Solve the little problems to prevent them from becoming bigger ones.

For Brad: 8. I accept that we are all human and different.

For Jennifer: 8. I accept that we are all human and Different.

For Brad: 9. The truth may hurt a little now, but better a little now than alot later.

For Jennifer: 9. The truth may hurt a little now, but better a little now than alot later.

For Brad: 10. Compromise is the happy medium when we agree.

For Jennifer: 10. Compromise is the happy medium when we agree.

Now, until you have written all ten thousand sentences and a thousand of each, the bank will hold onto your money and refuse to release it.

On 9 Mar 2005 22:17:36 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

You've been watching to much Dr Phill.

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

Dr. Phil, is lame. I have never known him to use a method that could be compared with religion, or a therapy that accepted that kind of statistical evidence of functional behavior modification.

At this web page there is a list of religions. http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/gthursby/rel/

Religion uses repetition, in a steady and unsteady fashion. It includeds who to marry and who not to, and as a rule what to eat. Many include what to wear and not to wear, and how to bury or burn the dead. How can an individual be trained from birth through adulthood to reliably maintain a practice? All of them include meditation, daily prayer, song or chants, and literature that is intended to be read, and re-read for life. http://www.academon.com/lib/essay/burial-rituals.html

All I am saying, is that if Brad Pitt, and Jennifer Anniston, want their relationship to work, they've got to quit letting any one of more than a dozen religions program them and program themselves to enjoy the company of each other. Those religions often perscribe advice, wisdom, parables, riddles, questions you should ask yourself, and as a rule a style of behavior that is centered on how you get along with anyone and everyone in general with the inclusion of common law. The Bible doesn't teach you more than you could learn in a popular bar, and it doesn't teach you how to invest time into your marriage in a fashion that will adjust, or fine tune your perspective and attitude towards your partner and not include the world as a whole. If anything, and you can trust your spouse, you shouldn't strive or drive yourself to trust just anyone like a fool. Religions typically center on adjustment meant for social life, and seldom circumscribe marriage with anything except role. The religions do not perscribe any form of attitude adjustment techniques that directly apply to marriage. As a rule they use those methods and center them on diety, diet, and general social attitude. Most religions are sexist to one extreem or another. Two people in a relationship where they should be viewing themselves as intellectual equals as a standard rule is not about religion. If you want to be happy, you have to do it yourself. Then I could say the Buddhists are right, or I could say the Christians are right, and there may be a half dozen or more relgions that have in some form stated practice makes perfect, or anything done once is always done better the second time, and as vague as they are do not tell you what you need to know. The Priest, or the Author may have known, or understood that, but they invented the diety, and the way of life for you. We have more information on more people than the wisest of the wisemen of ancient times just in watching the news. We observe millions, where and when they may have only been able to observe effectively a few thousand or hundred. There were no reporters, and anyone who observed, or spied upon so many would have been either king, queen or pharoh. So, if they invest the time, they can anticipate some Good Carmah, or consider that they will Reap what they sow. Alot of sayings are good for nothing, and when all of the advice is spent up supporting a diety or one peice of literature, it doesn't really teach you how to program yourself nor make example of how many people are being manipulated now, or then, and not just them as individuals, but their minds and perspectives of reality. That is one hell of a long list of religions to ignor, or not be analytical about. Bottom line, all that is working for any of them is that practice makes perfect be it through meditation, daily prayer, chanting or singing. The substance of the rules aren't what you need to be happily married though. The example shows you how to adjust and fine tune your perspective through repetition. They will be as happy as they choose to be. Life is only what you make of it. Dr. Phil is lame.

I have one more sentence for Jennifer and Brad to write 1000 times.

If ignorance is bliss, I'll forget we're not having sex.

I have one more sentence for Jennifer and Brad to write 1000 times.

If ignorance is bliss, I'll forget we're not having sex.

I have one more sentence for Jennifer and Brad to write 1000 times.

If ignorance is bliss, I'll forget were not having sex.

On 10 Mar 2005 22:02:44 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

I notice that most of the links are for American branches.

I still give the 'reconciliation' 6 months tops.

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

Well,

Self programming can allow you or me or any individual who is willing to follow through what ever perspective of reality that they want. I look at like this, if both people don't write sentences when one wants to and the other doesn't, it's not going to work. I have known somebody who did write sentences that way, and she seemed more like she was enslaved to her emotions. She did love her husband in the ideal fashion, and I mean in a way that I always dreamed of being loved. But, it isn't like I didn't have the same desire to love my girlfriend so much. I do have that desire, but people are all different. My ex, told me that she didn't need it. I have had relationships before, and from experiance I can tell which way it will go. It always points at misdirected anger and frustration. Typically, it all spawns from the same things for the same reasons. First you agree to take turns cleaning, and if one person always does things as soon as it's thier turn, and the other procrastinates, the procrastinator typically feels like they do all of the work. Example, on my turn to do dishes, I do them that night, and on her turn she waits until the sink is full or she wants to make something using a dish that's dirty at the time. Now, when a week passes, and she finally does do the dishes, the next night I do them because, I want the house to be clean all of the time. But, then I have two bowls from breakfast, two plates from dinner, a pan, a pot six glasses, and some silverware. When she does the dishes, there isn't any plates left in the cupboard. There might be a few bowls, and we ran out of silverware and were washing it out of the sink for several days. She acts like the workload is intense, but it's not. She looks at the work she gives herself and complains. She counts how many meals we ate and I didn't do the dishes. I did at first use a rock solid every other day/every other week scheme at one time, but the result was that I was really doing all of the housework. So, I sat down and talked with her, and told her that when it's your turn, it stays that way until you've done it, and when it's my turn it will stay that way until I do it. The house begins to look filthy. The trash goes out when it's overflowing on her turn, and when it's full on mine. She complains that she has to make two trips, and somehow I'm the one producing all of the trash. The trash needs to go out every day and as infrequently as every other day. If you wait a week to take out the trash, there's a bag sitting next to the trash can, it's full, the trash can is full, and whatever fell onto the floor is on the floor. I have a weeks worth of clothes in my wardrobe, she had almost a full months worth. She would wait until every towel went sour and smelled if she could. Every other week. I had a talk with her, and said, you know, if you want this relationship to work, you can't let the place we live in get to a point that you or I are making excuses to escape it. I can't percieve that anything she uses, or that I use comes in more or less packaging and on the topic of trash generation, we are equals. But, putting off the work, and who's to blame? She blames me. How can I work as many hours as she does and be expected to go to work for money, and then come home only to work as her hand maid? I cannot imagin that a woman would want a dick more or less than a guy would want pussy. But, I can't help but think that she believes that it's worth so much to me to have it, that all of that extra service needs to be done. I don't mind housework, but I am fair to myself insomuch as to not enslave myself to anyone for anything. There's a difference between being fair and pampering a woman. As I see it, we all hate housework and the best we can do mentally, is not mind it, but that won't change how I want it done and don't want to be doing that all day, or get off work and still have 3 or 4 hours of work left to get done. If she did half of it, it would only be 1 and half hours, or 2. If it's a relationship, where do we have time to do anything if I'm cleaning house? Paying bills only comes around once a month and we both do that. What went wrong? Well, she blames me, and she gets angry with me. The reasoning changes and morphs over time. I'm not doing everything for you. I won't do all of the housework. She says, "I always have to do everything." literally she's only made the work harder for herself by putting it off and letting the little messes build up into bigger ones that are much harder to clean, and then that in itself pisses her off. Sure, the day after my turn, or the week after my turn cleaning the toilet I remind her, one time. I don't want an arguement, I don't want to be pushy, and I don't want anything more than to be acknowledged that I stated so much. So, I would say to her, "It's your turn to do the dishes." or "It's your turn to do the laundry." When you live alone, if your house is clean, then you will always be clean. But, if you live alone, and you are a slob, you will always be a slob. Until you change when you are on your own, you won't. You can get stuck in a situation where you want to sit around the house and your partner doesn't because, it's filthy. If she has to she illude you and the mess even though she made it. If you ask her if it were clean would she stay, she might say yes, but that doesn't change how it's her turn, or your labor. I rather spend 2 hours giving my girlfriend a massage, but she didn't like that. I rather not do housework. I would love to sit in the bathtub, or take an hour long shower with her, but I wouldn't use housework to avoid that. If the house is a complete mess and there isn't a spot to spawl out on the massage is out. She doesn't feel like a shower or a bath, and that leaves television. So, the tv replaced me 85 to 90% of the time. The rest was work, and staring at the mess. There is only small point here to be made. People will not do anything they do not want to do. You can go on and on about the smell and that won't change anything. How much better it would smell if the house was clean, and that won't change their mind. The potential of food poisoning, and how the crap on the dishes is starting to smell, or the leftovers in the refrigerator are growing. Sanitary issues, odors, appearances, nothing changes when a person doesn't want to do what is best and most right for themselves. If you do it all of that for them they even loose appreciation for that.

Here's what you don't think about in repetition. Everytime you see the garbage that full and blame me, when it's your turn, and don't take out the trash, you've said the same thing the same way.

I hate this mess, it's your fault, and you should take out as much trash as I have to.

In month there's roughly 30 days, you can think that ten or twenty times in a day and almost miss it. Over time it ferments like something that's rotting.

I hate you, this is your mess, I always have to take out most of it.

She's no longer thinking about me kindly. She once only hated the mess and now she hates me. She quit considering that she even threw anything of any volume away and out of her own laziness understands that there is more because she doesn't take out when it's full, but when it's overflowing, or there's two or three bags next to the trash.

This same mode transistion takes place with all of the chores. Why? Because, I will not become the household slave. I am more than willing to do half. All I was asking is that you be fair to me and I will be fair to you. I'm not being disrespectful of you, and please do not be disrespectful of me.

Well, in that situation, even writing one notebook page every other day of sentences would have helped. But, I was being fair. I did write sentences though at that time, but I wrote, "I will be to class on time every day." I wrote "I will be a gentleman." I wrote, "I want to be a gentleman", I wrote, "I will pay attention to my classwork." and went to college. I would sit in class and the noise that once distracted me, couldn't and at the moment I actually stopped to listen and pay attention, I was shocked at how loud the noise in the room really was. I attended college for five years and only missed one day. I did not have any enemies, and I wouldn't expect a gentleman would. I had a flopped relationship, but could use the same advice I was giving in a fashion that didn't get me all tied up emotionally, nor enslave me with emotional ties. I did enough to know that my advice is damn good or better than drugs, if you have a brain, it works better than drugs.

I don't often reply to my own messages, but this time I will. I just believe that it is important to make a point.

Negative, or positive repetitions are natural in the human mind. You can look back at your own thinking and remember plenty of things, and plenty of times that you've seen something and thought the same thing you did the first time you saw it. In a manner of speaking, the fat woman is fat until she looses weight, and every time you see her you think, "She's fat." Anything you tell yourself over and over again typically forms a habit. A habit can be like tying your shoe, and you just don't think about even though it's a learned behavior. Likewise, when your shoe is untied you just tie it. You don't think about the over, under, around, and through. If there was a little tale your parents told you, or taught you to help you remember how to tie you shoe, you've probably forgotten that. That is an example of a learned or taught behavior, and it doesn't effect your social life. But, those repetitions that come to mind, and are repeated daily, weekly, monthly, all add up. Often we think about how old we are in years, and when I turned 39 I was 14,235 days old, or 341,640 hours old of which I spent 227,760 hours awake, or 9,490 days awake. I eat everyday, but that's not an opinion of anything, and there is no real reason to think about it. But, the repetitions that do make a difference can be the daily enforcement of rules put forward by your parents. Well, you might think about doing something wrong, but everytime you do you think about getting caught and getting in trouble. So, if you are about to do something wrong you may think about that ten, twenty, or for hours at a time and at the end of that you always remember that if you get caught, you will get in trouble. At the point you choose not to do what you know is wrong your behavior has been modified. But, the method, and means, and the reason is still all the same as the function of repetition found in religion. You didn't think of it as meditation, but it was. Comparing stratatgies of how you will go about doing something you know is wrong to avoid getting caught, and comparing that to getting caught isn't any different once you've decided not to do the thing you were planning to do wrong. When you don't catch the repetitions when they are a part of your though processes you are still programming yourself. If you just let it go, it will continue in the direction that you see it heading in. If it is positive, than it will continue in a positive direction. If it is negative it will continue until the irritation becomes enough to change your behavior. Eventually, you will come to point that you choose to avoid what you can't think positively about. There is a broad range of things negative or postive, but if you don't take control, you don't benefit, and won't by starting over.

It can be worse. I was studying circumcision, and found that 60% of the male population who has been circumcised participates in some form of permiscous sex. Where the uncircumcised group only retains a 35% margin for the same problem. That tells me that when you cut off erogenous tissues, the brain retains the recieving station for the nerves that were destroyed by the process. There is a part of that neither your nor any other woman can touch to satisfy. The nerves were removed that were required to send those signals to the brain by removing the foreskin which contained those nerves. In some fashion, that when a guy goes searching for that satisfaction, the mind is searching for satisfaction for an area of the brain that will never see it. You might think the grass is greener over there, but it's not. The older you get the more people that you can find that are single, have problems be it mental, drugs, alcohol, or temperment. The older you get, the smaller the crowd is, and the real catch is going to be something that you lost in vein attempt to find some form of stimulation or satisfaction you will never find. Somebody literally cut that off. Your brain can and will tell you that you are not satisfied with sex, and you will feel the need for something you just cannot seem to get. If you know that emotionally the relationship is satisfactory, and you do have sex when you want it, the lack of satisfaction you may be experiancing if it's during and orgasm, or right after an orgasm that any form of frustration occurs, would be your missing member, and a recieving station set up in your brain that was designed genetically to be involved in that orgasm but couldn't be..

On 12 Mar 2005 01:07:34 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

<snipped as a service to usenet>

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

Well, I hope they read this thread. To sum it all up the repetitions of the minds own thinking can directed by handwriting sentences. Here is why, basically when you are just thinking you don't involve your arms, legs, eyes, or hands.

http://www.umich.edu/~cogneuro/jpg/Brodmann.html

The Frontal lobe is responsible for cognitive thinking. Understanding, organizing sentences before you say them.

Now, if you look at the table the areas of the brain that would be active in forming a habit of thinking, feeling or percieving reality, and using writing repeated sentences will go much farther than meditation{frontal, and temperal lobes}, singing, or prayer{Section 44, frontal and temperal lobes} in forming a habit of thinking or an attitude. What I mean is that you've told yourself to feel a certain way about a certain person so many times that it has become like tying your shoe, and you no longer even consciencely pay attention to that or thinking that way, you just respond in that fashion without any concideration, forethought or concern and almost completely automatically in a reactive sense. Now, writing sentences repetitively causes you to use the frontal, temperal, and occipital lobes, that's to consciencely do what you are doing, frontal lobe, remember what you are writing and what it means, temperal lobe, occipital and parietal lobes write inside the lines and neatly, motor controls to write using your arm and hands requires areas 4, 6, and 8. It is closer to a whole brain activity, and if you experiance any emotion in the process, or check to see if your feelings are equally as true for you as one paper, when it is important to be honest with yourself for this to work, then it can make a big change in a person, their attitude and their way of thinking.

If you think cults or religions have an effect on people's lives, and you should because alot of people have been born, raised and die believing in any one of many different religions, and literally there is a series of repetitions invovled that they maintain to maintain their faith. The chorus in a song is repeated material. If you sing it twice, you re-inforce it. You can't remember the lyrics to a song that doesn't effect you in some way. What made it so important to remember? Was you precption of it a reason? Did you like so much, or could related to it? Did it just help you express how you felt at the moment, or in some way did it seem to represent who you are in your own eyes? Was it love song that really meant what you felt? I know that you wouldn't think that singing along was like egging yourself along and if she left you, it did make matters worse even though you may have only felt that you were entertaining yourself. If the imagined target of your affection is not the true companion you've chosen, it would mess up your relationship because you would be more likely to act like you wanted that other person. Then your partner sees your attraction towards them even if you are not aware of it. Little things like that will bring about a change in the expression on persons face and when that other person walks in the room you don't want to look like you just took a shit and ah, she walks in the room. The person cannot represent a negative load and miss it when some-one else seems to change their whole attitude towards everything, or just suddenly relax and seem so relieved. If you entertain a thought, you can literally cause your feeling to intensify for an individual. Paper, pen and ink. The Pen is Mightier than the Sword, but to cut through all of the bullshit in this world and actually have a part of life you can enjoy, you will have to become a master of the sword and use it well. Life is what you make of it for yourself. If you want to enjoy life, you have to use what works. If the alcohol hasn't, doesn't, didn't, then don't use it. If you haven't tried it, think about it this way, once the booze tasted bitter, but over time it tasted better and became desirable. The sword is the same, it is sharp, and it is heavy in it's own way and until you've actually put some effort into it will not appreciate the true power of the sword. Over time skill and the study of ancient styles, like in the archives of 16th century poetry, and picking through it to see how you really feel and not lean on your own ideas or imagination for what to say or how to say it, and wield the mighty sword! If the proof is in the pudding you can't taste what you don't make.

Okay, let's just say that for one second you were rich, famous, you are looking for the best woman can find, and you're over 30 years old. Where would you look? A dance hall, bar, church, where? If you get involved with a lady from church, chances are if it doesn't work you or she will be excommunicated and will have to give all of the friend you make, or have made. If you do marry another woman, it's going to be tough to determin if she loves you or money more, unless, she's rich. But, if you are looking for a faithful woman, you have to be analytical of her past track record, and if you are looking at a single rich woman, how many husbands has she had and how long did those relationships really last? You can figure that the novelty will wear off eventually as it did in the past. That happens to everyone. Unless, of course you take advantage of the excitement that you find in the beginning of a relationship to write sentences I can't frankly see how the novelty won't wear off. But, you can get that back because, it is a perspective issue of the minds perception of reality.

Here's the problem with being over 30 and single. Most of the people that are single in your agegroup are single for a reason. The last partner they had they couldn't stand, or couldn't stand them. If that many people don't like em' how can you expect to be any different when they've been avoided by that many people? When the majority of people around a person begin to avoid them it is for a reason. It could be drugs, or a bad attitude towards everyone, or a really negative depressed attitude towards everyone or everything. What ever the reason, there typically is one once you've gotten past thirty, and divorce isn't a good sign. As a rule the best are taken, and if you want something that good, or a literally serious about a lasting and long term relationship the best place to look is at a funeral home. Yes, and I do mean going to funerals to look for a partner. The reason is that you are rich, and chances are insurance money is going to be involved and she won't be terribly poor as a result. But, there and then you can assess the previous relationship, the depth of the emotional attachment, and you will still need to make friends with prospect's friends in order to evaluate the situation. In otherwords you still need to find out if that person was only married once, and didn't cheat. It is and it isn't the place. First off there is no better place to make an evaluation of the situation. Second, you would know that it isn't a problem that was keeping that individual single. Yea, I do talk to God, but, I don't like the answers.

On 13 Mar 2005 01:47:33 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

If I was that rich I'd buy out General Electric, then I'd be the owner of Universal Studios and Universal Music and NBC ect.

http://www.ge.com/en/product/home/television.htm

And as a MAJOR player in hollywoodland, I'd have no trouble getting to know Tara Reid, or any of several available top shelf women in hollywoodland. :-)

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

I hope she's already had sex with a guy that wasn't circumcised. I've been studying that, and if you are circumcised, I bet it wouldn't work out. In comparison, after circumcision, you are dry, and callused. The uncircumcised, have glands at work and allot more skin. If she's ever tried it, I'm sure she look at a circumcised cock like somebodies big toe.

On 14 Mar 2005 00:11:56 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

1) I'm not a Jew. 2) I don't give a monkey's who Tara has had sex with before she'd met me, she's smart enough to make sure she doesn't pick up a STD, or get pregnant. 3) She'd be having a one to one physical and emotional relationship with me, and that is all that matters to me.

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

Ha, ha ha, if you are an American, 80% were circumcised shortly after birth. Meaning, you wouldn't know if your tool was modified until you took the time to look at somebody elses. I'm not gay either, and that's why it took me until I was damn near fourty to look. That really hurt, becuase, of that 80% a percentage of that lost half of the erogenous tissues that are invovled in having an orgasm. Which really tells me I can't be satisfied unless I choose to be happy with the fact that the recieving station set up for the nerves for that specific area of my body will never be activated, or satisfied. Because, I do not have the nerves there where the foreskin was removed, there is an area of my brain that by nature of the gene would have been recieving signals from those nerve endings. But, since it's has no nerves connected too it, it recieves no stimulus during sex, and cannot particapate in an orgasm. This standardized lack of satisfaction found in circumcised men, pretty well explains too me about how I felt in having sex, reaching an orgasm, and how I felt emotionally afterwards. It just makes sense to why I feel emotionally frustrated right after an orgasm. In bed I don't show it, my partner wouldn't know, and I haven't had any real complaints about my capacity in bed, or found any woman complaining about a lack of satisfaction concerning sex. I make sure the lady does have her orgasm each and every time I have sex. I make a strong point of centering my mind on that it is her pleasure that she seeks, even when she aims to please. But, when I'm asking for it, I now know why it never helps, and it makes sense of allot of my past.

When I was with my first girlfriend, sex was so unsatisfying that I sat down and talked with her about going to church. She was all for doing anything that might help our relationship, and so we began to go to allot of churches. Every Sunday, and Wedsday we went to a different church. Then either she, I, or the both of us would go and talk to the pastor, or preacher. They didn't even think that it could have any connection to me having been circumcised. All they did was laugh at her, me or both of us. What I was looking at was a verse in the Bible the mention that when a man marries that husband and wife become one flesh. I, at the time, honestly believed that it was because we were not connected in such a fashion that we shared the orgasms. Since, I was kid, I had literally believed that the connection there was psychic, and the way they explained it to me, is that it only had to do with the physical aspect of male penetration and copulation. It does associate to a direct lack of satisfaction as a result of the brain not having nerve endings for a recieving station and a bundle of neurons that are just idle during sex. I honestly believe that as an electronics technition my diagnostics of the situation really pointed at the fact of the matter and the real problem, and that was that something wasn't happening that should in my mind. What fit together, how and why was wrong, but I was looking at the right area of my brain, and wasn't too stupid, or dumb to realize that some-one had mutilated me after having studied the surveys, and results concerning circumcision. It still fucks with me, and I don't believe that I should ever marry, because that isn't what it was meant to be by God's own choosing in how a man should be created. So, it fouls up allot and it's really like only having the very end of your penis in a woman. Which by nature, isn't deep enough to cause a pregnancy. It's only far enough to cause a clitorial orgasm, and a woman may not be so happy with that. If they were, they'd just masturbate and never feel the need for a man, just rubber gloves. After what I had read in those surveys, if a woman gets tired of me, then there shouldn't be a law to keep her from leaving. I also believe that I am intitled to damages and compensation. But, how will I ever see the light day there with Bush in office, and the Doctor who done it, is probably dead by now. You should really take some time out to just read the scientific side of it, and look over women's point of view who've had sex with men that were both circumcised and uncricumcised, and then look how which men typically are faithful over who's typically not. The only question that rests on my mind, and isn't a question they've asked women I've read about in any of the surveys as of yet, that I am interested in knowing is, "Permiscuity of women having relationships with circumcised me vs Permiscuity of women in relationships with uncircumcised men." That would tell me allot about how satisfied a woman is with sex in one case over another. But, I think that the results will be the same and 60% of the women involved with circumcised men will be cheating at one time or another on their men just like 60% of men do if they've been circumcised, and women married to men that are uncircumcised will be looking at the same margin again 35% will cheat. But, that is a big difference, and would show something. I believe that problem is in the genetic design and the mutilation of the penis.

On 14 Mar 2005 23:50:37 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

Why would you think I'm an American?

<snip> Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

You type in English, and you know who Tera Reid, is.

Now, I have a question, "Why is it that the Religious Community isn't held responsible for their actions, when Loraina Bobbitt, spent time in a mental ward?" When it comes to circumcision, they're nuts. Whereas, penis removal in America is assult, and in Russia, it's organ sabbottage.

On 16 Mar 2005 01:45:48 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

So do you. And it's T*a*ra. Most people in America of a certain age, and in Europe also know who she is.

What's having you're dick cut off got to do with Brad and Jen?

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

I had no problem reading this article, and it's rather long. http://www.danceuniverse.co.kr/know/elements_etiquette.htm

These two pertain to the fact that Brad, was born in America, and 80% are circumcised shortly after birth. The remaining 20% as a majority are from several other religions. But, the Jews get cut at 12. It effects you psychologically, and can cause allot of frustration in a man right after ejaculation. Whether or not anyone would admit to that, is beyond the point. Whereas, I believe women should know, and men should know themselves. There is no better way of solving a problem than understanding it. Without the foreskin, it is as if the man has only balanced on his head in an attempt to drill her bellybutton, and your genetic programming causes the frustration when the neurons in the brain which should be receiving those nerve impulses from the foreskin are not there. That tells a man at the most fundimental neurological level his penis isn't in, and when circumcision occurs shortly after birth and the frustration is there, that's the genetic programming at work. It's not her fault, and it's not his fault, the problem is the missing nerves which were woven into the foresking and surgically removed. As a rule they would be there to send signals to the brain when touched, pinched, cut, heated, sensual or otherwise. Fear, as we know it is adrenaline, sexual satisfaction is dependant on the stimulus of those tissues and neurons in that specific area of the brain. Cut off the tissue, and you cut off all of the nerves that were there to send those signals to the brian.

Exhibit A How cut vs uncut effects female sexual satisfaction and perception. http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/

Exhibit B How cut vs uncut effect male sexual perspective and faithfulness. **Note the vast majority of men who've been circumcised were at an age where they either hadn't had sex, or never knew that the organ was mutilated.*** http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/

I would also like to point out that there is a big difference in both the Statistics, and Survey results if you are reading The American Journal of Medicine vs Anything written in Europe. I believe that this is becuause both the American Medical Association, and the Relgious Commity is hiding allot. There are two real reasons, the Doctors don't want to get sued, and it's a primitive ritual and right of passage into manhood if not just as much of a function of religion as baptisms at birth. It's a combination of the two situations and wills to control information and what is broadcast over what is not that has fouled most scientific papers, surveys, and documents written in America.

What happens when you let a Jew, play doctor on a Christian?

You get another notsy.

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/

An explanation of the cruelty http://www.compleatmother.com/articles3/femalecircumcision.shtml

Techniques? http://www.circlist.com/instrstechs/instrumentset.html

Boy, wouldn't suck if the religious community went to hide a major protest of this surgical procedure and somehow this Helmut was some kind of symbolic representation? http://www.stahlhelms.com/WWII_German_M35_Helmet.htm

Rape causes protest, and likewise the mutilation of genitals. Eventually, the poeple wake up and realize that they've been violated against their will. If you were circumcised, you deserve 10 times as much in your social security check the day you retire. Why, because the United States Government made it legal.

Think about this, Satanists are notorious for sacrificing cats. But, we eat chicken, cattle, pork, turkey, goose, duck, rabbit, and frogs. Any one of these people claiming that it's some form of animal cruelty, are not thinking about their diet. They think that cattle are too dumb to know anything, or be trained. http://www.oneskyranch.com/wally.htm

Pigs can't be trained? Hell, I've known people who've owned farms and they are easily trainable. They do make great pets, and we eat the vast majority of them born in captivity. http://www.vetmed.iastate.edu/departments/vdpam/swine/petpigs/

There is no reason you can't keep a pet turkey or chicken as well as a Parrot or any other Amazonian bird. This guy has a turkey http://gallery.nx2k.com/misc_scenery_petturkey

And this woman is very concerned about her pet chicken: http://wcvb-tvpet.ip2m.com/index.cfm?pt=itemDetail&item_id=2685&site_cat_id=114

Even ducks can make great pets. http://www.pathtofreedom.com/pathproject/simpleliving/ducks.shtml

Okay, and I can watch em' blow em' away on this channel any day. http://www.outdoorchannel.com/

Now, if either a Satanist, Christian, Buddhist, Jew, Moslem, Hindu, or etc.. swam in the septic tank, because they wanted to, I still wouldn't let em' in the house, okay?

On 16 Mar 2005 22:05:27 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

You have an unhealthy fixation with circumcision, and I'm through with you're posts.

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

I'm not sure there is such a thing as a *healthy* fixation with that, though. :)

I don't believe that I have fixation. I have questions, and want answers. I have come a point were I am actually writing to researchers to make a few comparisons. But, I want them to use fMRI or any of the techniques or methods found on this web page to observe brain activity as to map out the area of the male brain responsible for the orgasm and measure the level, volume and area of the brain effected to compare the circumcised to the uncircumcised. I believe that out of ever point I've made earlier, I will be proven correct. http://www.users.qwest.net/~cortechsmar/movies.html

No, I don't think so. I realized that it was like apathy in some way, or trying to hold my breath and reach the surface during a dive. When I had my jaw wired shut becuase my jawbone was broken in two places, I actually experianced apathy. Right after they removed the wires, I was looking forward to going to Mc Donalds and having a big mac. I was then told by the doctor that I would have to pry my mouth back open. After the wires were removed, I realized that I couldn't open my mouth any farther than when I had the wires in. I struggled to open my mouth, and speak normally. At every point that I thought it was all over I still had three months of exercises left to go. Now, those nerves were still attached, and the muscles were still there, but when you don't know you can't function normally you make allot of mistakes. Those errors are simple things. You can make a sandwich and it's too big to get your mouth around. You could be sitting at the table and the amount of food on your fork is too big. The result is that you wind up with allot of food on your face, and that's embarassing, if not just frustrating.

Now, if you read in detail about embryological cellular neural development from the first paragraph with the title "INSIDE OUT DEVELOPMENT" down to the end of the document at this link: http://www.newhorizons.org/neuro/scheibel.htm You will have somewhat of a better idea concerning how there is a literal area of the male brain dedicated to the foreskin. It is not an unhealthy fixation. It is as normal as an amputee still being able to feel the limb that was removed. The area of the brain dedicated to the function reponds. Here's a refrence to a few case studies.

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro01/web1/Dawsonandoh.html http://www.macalester.edu/~psych/whathap/UBNRP/Phantom/casestudies.html

So, a literal problem, that I experiance during sex, is a direct result of trying to use a leg that isn't there to stand on.

My Constitutional Right to the Pursuit of Happiness was violated. Any and all anti-discrimatory laws have been voided out, and I am a victim. It is as if some-one had invaded my privacy. Then chose to jump into bed with me and any woman I might choose to marry and literally wreck sex by taking the pleasure out of it. If that pisses her off, it pisses me off. When I am the victim, I have to deal with the phantom limb never finding any satisfaction and as natural and powerful as the sex drive is some-one has added anticipation for something that never happens. Even though law supports the discrimination in circumcision, laws have been written since that disable those laws and those are the anti-discrimination laws. If a woman cut off your legs to keep you in bed because she was both fat and ugly and knew you would eventually wind up with a hard on, would you just let it go? When you go to court, and she tells the judge that you came every time you fucked, will you be embarassed? If she insists that it is proof of your satisfaction and her Attorney sides with her, where will you be?

You know, if I were gay, I'd have a right to be abnormal.

On 13 Mar 2005 01:25:53 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

What's it to do with Brad and Jen?

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

If it were my marriage, I would have been reading poetry, and looking for what best summed up the postive feelings I had for my wife. I would be very analytical and concise about what I chose for a sentence to write. Second, I wouldn't have lent any time to any other standard. As I see it, if a woman doesn't want to better the relationship before anything goes wrong, then she doesn't want a relationship period. The method is proven, because the same techniques are used by a long list of religions, and if you want a faithful partner in life, then the example shows you that from birth to death they do follow the instructions on how to feel, who to marry, what to eat, and who to worship. A faithful woman and a faithful man wouldn't ignor the facts that support what can and will or does work to modify behavior, perspective, and attitude to best accomodate their partner. If we can all accept that we are not perfect, then why justify doing nothing when making the best of it takes time and effort from both partners? I want what seemed to be the dream marriage and relationship to continue to be a dream come true for Jennifer and Brad. What good is a conselor who perscribes a pill, when anyone who invented that pill, or tested it, had to solve a long list of problems and think about and solve each one to get it to market? What consistantly works is thinking things through and solving the problems as they are for what they are. Drugs, come in one of three catagories, those which compensate for hormone imbalances during menapause, phlacebeos and those which are used to escape reality. Problem solving starts with what works for most people, and religion proves that it is repetition of sentences that are either in the context of "What you will do", "what to think", "what to feel emotionally", "How you will respond to a situation", and direct commands and/or orders. Typically, they are instructed to meditate, memorize, read, and re-read those instructions. As a result, the lyrics of religious songs also contain the same instructions. But, religion, does not center on your personal tastes, or ideas as for what you want and know you need in a relationship. Self programming will prove to be much better, but not if it is never applied in a fashion that can and will work in a balanced and fair manner. I can't prove that a meditation session resulted in both parties thinking on the guidelines of what would improve their relationship. I can't give proof to either partner that they did apply themselves equally in a fashion that is, was, or would be emotionally binding. I wouldn't support taking advantage of anyone by getting either the husband or the wife alone to write like that. The individual will become what they make of themself. I perscribed 1000 sentences because I know that anyone could see a difference or change in themselves through that. 10,000 total.

In alt.tv.friends on Sat, 12 Mar 2005, The Flavored Coffee Guy wrote :

Because no-one else does? :)

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 07:12:41 +0000, Paul Hyett wrote:

Because it's just off topic verbal diarrhea, but the guy is an American. :)

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte

On 11 Mar 2005 23:57:47 -0800, "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote:

Well I still give Brad and Jens reconciliation 6 months before the final parting.

<coffee guys domestic problems snipped as a service to usenet>

Christopher ++++++++++++ "The best way to keep one's word is never to give it."

Napoleon Bonaparte