Spoliers from Wanda at E! Online...

Oct 17, 20008 posts by 6 postersalt.tv.friends
8 posts
LizDCalt.tv.friends

Spoliers from Wanda at E! Online...

http://www.eonline.com/Community/Wanda/Trans/Archive2000/001016.html

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

S

P

A

C

E

Ugh no. No J&P please. Although I do think they're setting it up that way..Phoebe is always flirting with him. It's just hard to think of anything between them as anything more than a fling.

====== es*o*ter*ic b : of or relating to knowledge that is restricted to a small group

2 a : limited to a small circle

http://rainforest.care2.com/welcome?w=417432466
Tom HawleyLizDCalt.tv.friends

Rubbish. Where exactly is the non speculative part of this information? I don't believe for a seconds that the writers are that stupid, and I don't think any real fan would want to see all three couples paired up. It'd be very unrealistic.

TinaTom Hawleyalt.tv.friends

Hellooooo!!! After getting drunk in Vegas, Tom Hawley doodled cat whiskers on his/her face and miaowed this little lot at a statue...

Exactly what I thought. Wanda can deliver the goods on occasion, but she doesn't half come up with some mad stuff in the interval.

Le gr�, go deo! Tina: The upholder of Angelicism - or something like that...
DidiTom Hawleyalt.tv.friends

"Tom Hawley" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:yQ_G5.1335$[email]...

Hmm... I'm not sure. Although, I don't necessarily think, J&P should hook up together, it's not as unrealistic as you say. They're pretty close, there have been hints about this since the first season (remember, when Joey and Phoebe kiss, and they both really seem to like it?). Plus, what's really realistic on a TV-show? I doubt, someone would really run around, being freaked about the fact, that he/she found his/her identical hand-twin. Also, if I was very close with one of my best friends, and that for more than 7-8 years, and I was still alone AND found that friend attractive and vice versa: why would coming together be unrealistic?

Just a thought.

Didi

In article , "Didi" wrote:

Friends?

Rachel,

sounds, the

we all

I'm no fan of Wanda's, and I also thought this was pure, unadulterated crap on her part, and then I saw this in Amy Reiter's article at Salon.com, a website for which I have some respect ....

http://salon.com/people/col/reit/2000/10/20/npfri/index.html

Phoebe and Joey sittin' in a tree? Lisa Kudrow has told a group of reporters that, in time, she's certain her character on "Friends" will become more than buddies with Matt LeBlanc's character. "It's inevitable, isn't it? It's just a question of when it will happen," the "Friends" star said, adding that she and LeBlanc "can see the writing on the wall" about Phoebe and Joey's slow-budding romance. "We have our ideas on what should happen to our characters, but I don't think it will carry that much weight." Hey, Phoebe, how you doin'?

... So, maybe Wanda was legitimately repeating something she heard, although it's still a leap to say that it is the ending everyone wants ...

Ida

Quo plus habent, eo plus cupient. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.

In article ,

going

OK, this was already discussed elsewhere. I hate Deja!

Quo plus habent, eo plus cupient. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
Tom HawleyDidialt.tv.friends

I

don't

be

up

As usual I must point to my lack of real interest in the lives of the characters compared to my interest in the quality of the show. Pairing Joey and Pheobe wouldn't lead us anywhere in particular. It'd be pointless. Can you really picture them together, not as people, but as sitcom characters. After a few "weird" connections it'd run dry.