Something strange going on with R & R (Vague refence to series 6)

Jan 26, 200010 posts by 8 postersalt.tv.friends
10 posts

OK, during an incredibly boring maths lesson, I came to a sort of conclusion about Ross and Rachel, and what the writers are thinking. (Sort of)

In TOW The Morning after, it was implied that Rachel still loved Ross, but was just mad at him about the whole 'Chloe' thing. (This was actually confirmed in TO At The Beach.) Now we are never actually told that they had fallen out of love, so to speak, which I think is quite a significant point. (Well *I* do anyway!)

In early series 4 they had many arguments, but they were more based on jealousy, and they seemed, to me, to get over it fairly quickly. In TOW the Fake Party, they seemed so much more like best friends than ever, and Rachel was treating him like a human for once. Of course she was in love with him at the time, but I think she's nicer to him when she doesn't know that she's in love with him!

Once the wedding had been and gone, Rachel told Monica that she was going to tell Ross that she was in love with him. Monica made Rachel feel guilty for being in love with him, and she tried to stop her from telling him. I know he was married, and trying to patch up a marriage, and it puts him in an awkward position, but you do stupid things when you're in love. Also, he NEVER told her that he didn't love her back, but instead there was rather a sweet line where she says 'Thank you for being so nice' and he replies, 'No! Thank you for... thank you'

Well, in parts of series 6, (Don't worry, I'm not gonna spoil it for anyone) the writers seem to be making Ross and Rachel (look, I'm being vague! :)) think that having any loving feelings for each other is a bad thing, and that they must feel incredibly guilty if they do.

I think that in reality they would be back together by now, but in sitcom land, there are important factors to consider:

1. The writers are waiting for sweeps or the finale episode(s) 2. They don't fall in love at the same time. (Amazing coincidence!) 3. They seem to be under the impression that the other one doesn't love them, especially if they do love them. 4. If they are in love with the other, and the other doesn't know, they are teased about it mercilessly by their so called 'Friends'. 5. They think that if they get back together it will get too complicated, which I can understand, but they could at least give us fans *something* to chew on!

I hope I haven't given anything away about series 6, I've tried to be as vague as possible. :)

Sam Stein http://www.steinfamily.demon.co.uk/ Remove NOSPAM in my email address to reply

Hellooooo!!! After getting drunk in Vegas, Sam Stein doodled cat whiskers on his/her face and miaowed this little lot at a statue...

You have good points, but the reality is that the writers don't really have *any* particular focus with these two, and so for as long as that's the case we're lumbered with this ongoing game of cat and mouse, with neither getting caught.

Tina

-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==---------- http://www.newsfeeds.com The Largest Usenet Servers in the World! ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including Dedicated Binaries Servers ==-----

Tina Nellis wrote in message news:[email]...

Yeah, I know. This game has got to end soon! Well, they'd better get together before Friends ends, or some writers are gonna go home wearing their lunch!

Samantha Stein http://www.steinfamily.demon.co.uk/

In article , "Sam Stein" wrote:

really

wearing

I was always under the impression that a reuniting was on the cards, but now... I don't know. The writers seem to be toying with R&R, but are getting nowhere.

Kaytee

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.

Hellooooo!!! After getting drunk in Vegas, Sam Stein doodled cat whiskers on his/her face and miaowed this little lot at a statue...

Some writers are gonna go home *being* their lunch if R&R aren't back together by the end. :)

Tina

-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==---------- http://www.newsfeeds.com The Largest Usenet Servers in the World! ------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including Dedicated Binaries Servers ==-----

On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:33:47 +0000 Tina Nellis wrote:

Oh, they better believe it!

[email] [email]

Free audio & video emails, greeting cards and forums Talkway - http://www.talkway.com - Talk more ways (sm)
HeLeNa *!*Tina Nellisalt.tv.friends

yes I mean they are really overkilling R+R breka-up/make-up/break-up/marry etc.... ENOUGH !!

they need to just sort them out.. either have them together (which will please a lot of people) or keep them apart

(I feel like I'm paraphrasing Texas' last single.. *lol* "yeah when we are together.. and when we are apart,.") ENOUGH !! *Lol*

but by means can they NOT get rid of the one thing that keeps me going in life.. C+M !! *lol*

My theory that when Friends finally ends.. there will be a happy R+R as well as my beloved C+M.. and who knows.. those rebellious darlings who like J+P.. why not ?? it could bring in many a joke ?? after all Chandler has stepped over the threshold into commitment.. why can't darling little Joey do it too ?? he's gotta grow up one day !!

.

visit my website and sign my guestbook www.homestead.com/helenahouse/me.html

Tina Nellis wrote in message news:[email]...

==----------
==-----
ActiviaHeLeNa *!*alt.tv.friends

"HeLeNa *!*" wrote:

He's always been a little bit slower then chandler if you know what I mean. ~Act