Matt LeBlanc Interview In EW

Aug 2, 2003, 9:49 AM ET12 posts by 5 posters
12 posts
AlethaAnne

This was an AOL exclusive, I think, so I'm posting the text and not the link.

August 1 2003

If you can't have six friends, one's pretty good. And if you can only have one, this is a pretty good one to have.'' So says a tickled NBC Entertainment president Jeff Zucker, who ended a Friend-zy of speculation last week by announcing that Matt LeBlanc has agreed to star again as happy-go-lunky Joey Tribbiani in a ''Friends'' spin-off, which is being shepherded by series exec producers Kevin S. Bright, Scott Silveri, and Shana Goldberg-Meehan. When ''Joey'' assumes that familiar Thursday slot in fall 2004, suffice it to say the stakes will be slightly higher than with LeBlanc's last two spin-off attempts, 1991's ''Top of the Heap'' (from ''Married…With Children'') and 1992's ''Vinnie & Bobby'' (surprisingly, from ''Heap''). ''I'm excited and a little nervous and honored,'' says LeBlanc. ''Maybe more than a little nervous.'' Here's what else our Friend to the end -- and beyond -- revealed about his high-profile project.

When did the spin-off idea first come up?

Warner Bros. and NBC approached me about a year and a half ago. And at the time, it felt so premature -- it was something I didn't even really want to think about. ''Friends'' wasn't, in my opinion, near the end yet. But that began the courting process, if you will. And as time went by, my curiosity became more and more piqued…. I remember the first dinner I had with Peter Roth, the president of Warner Bros. Television. We sat down and he just laid it out there on the table, and I was like, Wow. I was really floored. I didn't know how to respond, but my first response was ''Well, what would we call it?'' And he said, ''We'd probably call it 'Joey.''' And just to ease the tension of the moment, I said, ''Why don't we call it 'Where the Hell Is Everybody?'''

Do you have a concrete premise?

There've been some rough ideas thrown around, but it's [in the] very, very, very infantile stages.… I would imagine it takes place in L.A., with Joey's acting career out there.

Did you mull it over with the other Friends?

As soon as I heard about it, I went to them and I told them. We have a very honest, open relationship, all of us. I wanted them to hear it from me. I didn't want there to be any weird vibes. And they've all been on board, very supportive the whole way.

Would you have preferred another season of ''Friends'' instead of a spin-off?

If ''Friends'' could continue on, it would be much less scary for me.… I try not to torture myself like that because this one really is the last one. But would I do another one if everyone was in? Yeah, I'd do another one. It's the best gig in town, man. I got a great parking spot down there. You know how long it takes to get that parking spot?

There are some risks here, including the inevitable ''Well, it's not 'Friends'…''

It shouldn't try to be ''Friends.'' If people say, ''It's no 'Friends,''' I'll say, ''Well, that's a good observation. No s--- it's no 'Friends'!''

Was there ever talk about doing a spin-off with Jennifer Aniston? That was talked about briefly, but then abandoned. I don't know why. The only talks I was seriously involved in were the ones that involved the Joey show.

So much, then, for Joey and Rachel winding up together?

I think that Rachel belongs with Ross. I'll kill Joey if he ends up with her.

Much has been written about NBC's search for the next ''Friends.'' Now the network is handing you the coveted Thursday-at-8 slot when ''Friends'' signs off. You're in the hot seat.

Lot of pressure not to f--- up. [The time slot] is not something I fought for. NBC put that on the table right up front. That upped the amplitude on the whole thing. [Affecting English accent] ''Okay, we're at 11 now, right? Nigel?''

Your deal is unprecedented for a new series -- close to $15 million for the first year and an ownership stake in the show. Technically, though, you'll no longer be making $1 million per episode. Will you be able to scrape by on just $15 million a year?

Well, if you want to run some soup over to the house, I sure could use it.

Will this last season of ''Friends'' lay the groundwork for Joey?

I don't think it will have any bearing on the outcome of the writing on ''Friends'' at all.… ''Friends'' has definitely reserved and earned the right to its own course and destiny. I don't think that will be altered by what comes after ''Friends.'' In the last episode, does Joey have a suitcase in his hand? I don't think so. Maybe a bus ticket in his pocket -- but you don't see that.

Will there be guest spots waiting for the other ''Friends''?

I probably won't talk to them anymore. I mean, I have my own show. F--- them. [Laughs] No, of course, I would love to have them every week. That would be great. Like on ''Frasier,'' when Sam Malone comes by. Those are the best episodes.

When the ''Seinfeld'' actors failed to launch new shows, everyone called it the ''Seinfeld'' curse. Are you worried about a ''Friends'' curse?

Those people waited for two or three years, and they came back playing different characters. People want to be done with you when they're done with you. If you leave them and come back in a different light, they're looking only for the other character that you played. If you're lucky enough to score once in television history, chances are you should stick with that guy, if you're going to come back on TV again. I think that's why ''Frasier'' works. And why ''Watching Ellie'' perhaps does not work. It's important to give people what they want. If it's a character they've grown to love, I mean, people are letting you into their homes and they're spending time with you every week for 10 years. And then if you just yank that and say, ''Now I'm a fireman, ha-ha, and my name's Tim,'' they're going to say, ''Well, go f--- yourself, Tim. Where's Joey?'' It's that simple. When I'm an old man, if people say, ''He played Joey and that's all he did,'' then I can say, ''Yeah, that's right, that's all I did. Did it for a long time, it was a very satisfying career, pulled a lot of jokes, got a lot of great stories to tell my grandchildren -- and get off my property.''

ChristopherAlethaAnne

On 02 Aug 2003 13:49:04 GMT, [email] (AlethaAnne) wrote:

A one character career isn't much of an epitaph for an actor, but then if thats all Matt can do thats all he can do, sure will be a sad sight to see a 60 year old grey haired Joey saying the same lines, trying to pull attractive women.

Christopher "There's a light at the end of the tunnel" says the optimist. "It's probably a train coming
AlethaAnneChristopher

What I found even more saddening was the lack of respect he showed for fans of the storyline that transformed his career. Even if you're an R&R fan, you have to admit that it was the J&R storyline that elevated him from supporting player and comic relief to leading man with two emmy nominations and a spin-off.

ChristopherAlethaAnne

On 02 Aug 2003 14:51:05 GMT, [email] (AlethaAnne) wrote:

He's just go a touch of divaitus. Its a quite common ailment in hollywood land for actors and actresses who tend to forget its the fans who made them what they are. The symtoms are usually a big head, a detached attitude to the fans and a self intrested attitude while surrounding themselves with flunkes. But luckly for Matt some actors and actresses tend to have worse attacks then he has.

Christopher "There's a light at the end of the tunnel" says the optimist. "It's probably a train coming
ChristopherAlethaAnne

On 03 Aug 2003 12:41:33 GMT, [email] (AlethaAnne) wrote:

A valid opinion if your a woman, I prefer female thespians. ;-)

Christopher "There's a light at the end of the tunnel" says the optimist. "It's probably a train coming
Brian J. TarriconeAlethaAnne

On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:51:05 +0000, AlethaAnne wrote:

agreed that the J&R subplot really helped his status on the show, but i really don't see how you can get "lack of respect" from such a short statement, probably made off-the-cuff. regardless, to me, all he's saying is that he is an R&R fan (he's allowed to have an opinion too, right?) - he's not saying that J&R fans are idiots or that the J&R storyline is stupid or that he didn't enjoy it.

-brian

Brian J. TarriconeChristopher

On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:31:40 +0000, Christopher wrote:

i don't know - i tend to applaud ML for saying something like that. all i hear from tv stars when they finish up a long-running (or even not-so-long-running), somewhat-successful series is the usual "i want to get away from this character; i don't want the public to see me as only one character." and really - aside from generating more fame and success, what does it really matter? if 'joey' does pan out, ML will have two successful tv series under his belt and a buttload of money. hell, even if 'joey' is canceled after first season, that's $15 million he's made. that's many times more than most people see in a lifetime (and that's only a tiny fraction of what he's made already on friends).

back to my point - i think it takes a really exceptional actor to break away from a character that they've played for a long time, especially if that character is what made them well-known. such actors are few and far between, and i think it's nice that ML recognises the possibility that he may be branded 'joey' forever, and is making the best of it.

-brian

marikaAlethaAnne

[email] (AlethaAnne) wrote in message news:...

much as I like his affable Joey I just don't think he can carry a sitcom as the lead. (didn't he try once before, some short lived thing where he played the son? of a janitor or something?)

he was pretty invisible in Lost in Space too

That may have not been so much his fault though that era was replete with some of the worst SF ever.

that one called enterprise zone or entity factor or something where laurence fishburne kept winking in and out

and then Red Planet

I remember opening a message at work with great interest . . . we all usually know what to expect at movie premieres. I fowarded it on with great disgrunted disappointment.

EXCLUSIVE EMPLOYEE SALE 50% Discount for "Red Planet" Movie Premiere The ....invite you to attend the Warner Bros. Pictures premiere of "Red Planet" "Red Planet," starring Val Kilmer (> "> Heat,> "> > "> The Prince of Egypt> "> ), Tom Sizemore (> "> Saving Private Ryan> "> ), Carrie-Anne Moss (> "> The Matrix> "> ), Benjamin Bratt (TV> '> s > "> Law & Order> "> ), Simon Baker (> "> L.A. Confidential> "> ) and Terence Stamp (> "> Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menace> "> ), is an epic romantic adventure about one crew's intense struggle for survival against the most extreme odds imaginable on the planet, Mars. ...The evening event includes a catered reception, followed by a live auction featuring CNN Headline News' Lynne Russell, WSB-TV's Chuck Dowdle and 11-Alive's Wes Sarginson, and the movie at 8:30 p.m. You can mix and mingle among the likes of Environmental Super Hero Captain Planet, actors Tom Sizemore and Simon Baker, and the individual who made all of this possible -- Ted Turner.

(By the way, I can see Lynne Russell in the ladies' room on any given evening. I should spend $75 for a similar encounter?)

mk5000

"Run, Lola, Run (German film: "Lola Rennt") the English title I give is just the translation of the French title... -> an amazing film, mostly about being in a hurry."--Frank

Epsmarika

fun, your right tho it was not a difficult role.

lol, silly film but enjoyable.

kubrick rip off crap

Eps
ChristopherEps

On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 11:59:34 +0100, "Eps" wrote:

<nods> Be a long while before hollywood makes another film about going to Mars.

Christopher "There's a light at the end of the tunnel" says the optimist. "It's probably a train coming
marikaEps

"Eps" wrote in message news:...

i got another one of those premiere invites today

So, it's about time for me to send in the check. To ticket or no, that is the question.

mk5000

"So this takes account of the chances of hitting as well? Okay, that works"--P Bowles