I was thinking of a great gag just now.
I think you'll like it too, but maybe it's just me.
I'm intentionally inserting line breaks to provide a fake "spoiler space" so you can think about this for a second.
--------------- Chicken Idea: ---------------
In Peter's and the Chicken's next encounter, the chicken costume should be destroyed or removed to reveal...
D
R
U
M
R
O
L
L
P
L
E
A
S
E
The Cadbury Bunny! (Stupid long ears trying to steal clucking from chickens!)
"JPM III" wrote in message news:wDAie.16347$iU.375@lakeread05...
...but it's not a costume.
Greg
Sweet Zombie Jesus wrote in news:qgBie.3613$[email]:
Apparently you missed the point. It is a custome if Seth MacFarlane decides it's a costume.
Stewie's head never had a normal shape, but there was still a scene where he smashed his head into its current shape.
Brian was never neutered, but there was still a scene showing him just after that surgery.
Meg was never blind, deaf, dumb, and dismembered, but there was still a scene showing her as such.
Howard wrote in news:[email]:
What? What the hell are you talking about?
Howard wrote in news:[email]:
No, but you made no sense.
Howard wrote in news:[email]:
Did I say it was a costume? No.
Did he say I said it was a costume? Yes.
Therefore, he obviously missed something. But my wording wasn't specific, and you all made the silly assumption that I meant something I didn't. Your problem, not mine.
I'm done here.
Howard wrote in news:[email]:
I was implying, as I later clarified, that Seth can make it a costume at a moment's notice. It's his show.
And look, you obviously read the clarification.
No, my meaning was obviously very vague, or you would have understood what I meant from the start.
You say "we" as if anyone else is on your side.
Whew. I am not the world's nerdliest nerd-loving nerd farmer from Nerdsylvania. You guys are nearly as funny as the show. Your complimentary pocket-protectors are in the mail.
"Howard" wrote in message news:[email]...
it
be
On Wed, 18 May 2005 01:44:46 -0400, "JPM III" wrote:
It's funny because it's not a costume. The original reference in "Da Boom" has already made the distinction.
"I don't take coupons from chickens, not after last time..."
I have a good idea. Next fight with the chicken goes as the last two, then ends with something dramatic, like Peter and the chicken are on a raft about to drift over a waterfall, or on a train or truck about to go into a tunnel, and as the drama builds, you wonder, who will survive, what will be left of them, etc. Then without showing how the situation ends, it cuts to a scene of Peter sitting at home, maybe with cuts and bruises, and eating a bucket of KFC (could be a jumbo bucket) Just a thought. . .
I think the Chicken should only show up once per season. It would be interesting if next time, instead of the Chicken intruding on Peter's life, we get a snapshot of the Chicken's home life and routine for a minute or so before Peter comes out of nowhere and renews the fight.
Omniscoid3000 wrote in news:[email]:
Maybe they should make it two times per season, so the first time they show the season enjoying his home life, he can be hanging out, reading the paper, or just watching TV doing nothing ... and nothing happens ... just because everyone would be expecting that. Then they can fight later in the season when we least expect it. :-P