http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/buzz/columnists/berman_display.jsp?vnu_ content_id=1250876
Good is the sense that it's about the same as previous weeks (even tho these were reruns)
But bad is the sense that a 3.6 on primetime tv is low.
http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/buzz/columnists/berman_display.jsp?vnu_ content_id=1250876
Good is the sense that it's about the same as previous weeks (even tho these were reruns)
But bad is the sense that a 3.6 on primetime tv is low.
That seems pretty good, does it not? The new episodes got around 2.9 recently, so this is excellent for it, especially if that is average over 4 episodes. Although 3.6 is not a great rating, it's better than before.
"DT369" wrote in message news:[email]...
these
That must be wrong or a different source? Zap2It has Fox at 2.8 for night,
Family Guy with a 3.0 for first hour, and 2.7 second.
http://tv.zap2it.com/news/dailynielsenrankings.html?23041
"SubDrag" wrote in message news:vEH%7.349645$[email]...
4
http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/buzz/columnists/berman_display.jsp?vnu_
"DT369" wrote in message news:[email]...
these
... UPN!?!?!
*blink*
Correction.....
Opps!, both of those "is"s should be "in"s. :)
"DT369" wrote in message
It's not bad for a show that has absolutely ZERO advertising. Basically, the people who KNOW the show is on tune in every week...the ratings suck, but they're consistant. Why Fox won't advertise their own show that they put money into is beyond me. Egos and politics suck.