I really don't think Family Guy is over yet..

Oct 4, 2003, 10:48 PM ET8 posts by 6 postersalt.tv.family-guy
8 posts
Paulalt.tv.family-guy

I mean really, as of now I am having doubts that Season 3 is the last season ever to be made of Family Guy.

My points of evidence?

1. Fox promotes Stewie for Governor: Meaning that they are still giving FG characters attention.

2. Stewie on the emmy's anyone?: Again, showing that the shows and characters still have life.

3. The fact that there is still a HUGE FANBASE, the incredible DVD sales prove this; surely Fox would get some money out of a few more seasons?

4. Family Guy the movie: Yes we are going to be getting FG movie which again proves that FG is far from over still.

Hard to believe that with all the attention the show has been getting that Season 3 will be the last season. IMO there will be a few more, but maybe they will be a straight to DVD thing like the Movie. If not? Atleast FG ended while it was ahead, unlike what's happening with the Simpsons.

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 02:48:36 GMT, Paul said:

If the DVD movie rocks the country/world, it will easily come back, and FOX will be the first to air it next to the Simpsons over King of the Hill. If not, it'll be easily picked up by another network. It's a "drop in the bucket" moneymaker for whoever takes it. Cartoon Network and the DVDs have really helped this. Futurama might even be brought back, and I don't see how Groening can't be pushing it now. Both animated comedies are superior to the last three years of Simpsons.

Guatemalan Gedde wrote:

Well, one of the advantages of animation is that you can "never say never"; "Rugrats" made its "last" new episode in 1993, only to start up again in 1997.

Probably just to promote the DVDs.

You have to weigh the costs of making new episodes against the profits they would make. How many sets of the DVDs has Fox sold, anyway - and how many of "Futurama", which was also cancelled with pretty much no chance of Fox bringing it back?

I wouldn't be surprised if one of the reasons FG kept getting cancelled was because too many (insert adjective here) parents complained about the show's time slot, which, if I remember correctly, was always before 9:00. Remember, Fox actually withheld the second Futurama Christmas episode because of the show's time slot. There's no way it's getting on next to "The Simpsons", especially at 7:30. (Besides, being moved around from one time slot to another apparently didn't hurt "King of the Hill" any - Sunday, then Tuesday, then back to Sunday at 8:30, then Sunday at 7:30, then back to 8:30, and now back to 7:30.) However, the Sunday 9:30 time slot might be the perfect place for FG; it's on after one of Fox's popular shows ("Malcolm in the Middle"), it's late enough so most younger kids would be asleep by then, and it's popular enough to stay on, unlike a few of Fox's recent attempts to fill that time slot (and from the looks of the one clip I've seen, "Arrested Development" will be lucky to last into February).

Er, if that was true, UPN or WB would have picked it up by now. You have to remember what it costs to make just one episode.

(Here's a thought: HBO?)

-- Don

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 03:26:58 -0400, The Ghost of General Lee said:

FOX would carry the first right, always, until it completely shuns FG. It has not, and knows it's a money producer. It may suck, but never kid yourself into thinking Seth MacFarlane isn't owned by FOX. One of these days, I, too, hope...

CN could NEVER fund a new Family Guy. Seth quoted them as costing about a million dollars an episode and... cmon, you've seen the Aqua Teen Hunger Force animation. I don't think that's a million dollar an episode animation. CN couldn't afford it. - Jeff "They're like chicken flavored cookies!"

"Don't flatter yourself. You're not considered a crackpot. You're considered a wanker." - Steffan Alun

John HallPaulalt.tv.family-guy

In article ,

They chose the wrong character, though. Surely Brian would have been a sure thing to win the election? :)

John Hall "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." Oscar Wilde

"Paul" wrote in message news:8ELfb.24940$[email]...

Promotion for the dvd.

More promotion for the DVD.

So what. it costs fox more to make the show than repackage dvd's with poor special features.

One shot movies dont prove much.

Nope.

You totally miss the thought boat. The DVD's are SELLING THEMSELVES, people who liked the show are getting the DVD's. Fox doesn't need to advertise anything at all, because noone will go out and pay 40 dollars for the DVD of a show they haven't seen.

You also forgot about the insane ratings on Adult Swim. Like I said, there IS money to be made for Fox on Family guy and new seasons. There is no reason why they won't make more, they would get very nice ratings; and more DVD's to sell.

FG is far from over.

This isn't about promoting the DVD