OK, how many people were hoping they really had killed off the Roger (the alien) character last night?
Me!
OK, how many people were hoping they really had killed off the Roger (the alien) character last night?
Me!
Kimba W. Lion wrote in news:[email]:
*Hand up* ME! And it would have been perfect if they could have taken out the talking fish att he same time.
In message Worry wrote:
I was hoping that Roger would come back with only one eye, they'd blame the fish and Roger would kill the fish...
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Kimba W. Lion wrote:
We were drinking Mahitos when he said he couldn't get through the afternoon without a Mahito. I say thumbs up!!
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:23:49 -0500, David Seaman wrote:
Never heard of a Mahito. Do you perhaps meain a "Mojito?"
Kimba W. Lion wrote in news:[email]:
Well, I was, but it was interesting to see some of the back-story. So now we know why Dad (damn, I can't remember his name!) "owes" Roger. If it were me, though, I would have come clean about Roger right away - presumably "he saved my life" would have swayed the government to not kill him outright.
There's a lot more story there, though, like how he learned to speak English at all.
And now we know he watches _Family Guy_ (c.f. the line when he wants more wine)...
Jim (but lose the fish)
He is the funniest part of the show
I like Roger. He's annoying, but not to the level of Jar-Jar Binks. He's pro-active and totally in my face.
Who does his voice? Whoever it is, they got their Charles Nelson Riley sound down pat.
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:59:38 -0400, [email] (Chris �) wrote:
: :I like Roger. He's annoying, but not to the level of Jar-Jar Binks. He's :pro-active and totally in my face. : :Who does his voice? Whoever it is, they got their Charles Nelson Riley :sound down pat.
Charles Nelson Reilly? Paul Lynde.
Either one.
No. Paul Lynde.
The fish I could do without, but Roger I'm okay with. Although I would like to see future episodes centered around Stan, Steve and their escapades, Roger is good for the occasional smartass quip.