Why was Jane painting a copy of Francisco Jose de Goya's "Executions of the Third of May, 1808" in art class. Any thoughts?
Here is Jane's compared with the original:
http://people.ne.mediaone.net/adamsmith/jane.html
Why was Jane painting a copy of Francisco Jose de Goya's "Executions of the Third of May, 1808" in art class. Any thoughts?
Here is Jane's compared with the original:
http://people.ne.mediaone.net/adamsmith/jane.html
In article , [email] (Adam) wrote:
She was obviously feeling in a "tribute to the masters" sort of mood that week, given that the dance was done as a tribute to Pollack.
In article , [email] (Mikel Midnight) wrote:
I understand what you're saying, but would like to add that Pollock is not, IMHO, a great "master". I personally would not consider him a modern master either. I'm not saying that I dislike his art; my opinion is that he is using the media of paint in a new and original way, but not mastering it with virtuoso talent.
In article , [email] (Adam) wrote:
Because she can?
;-)
All hail Jane!
Scott
[email] (Adam) wrote:
It's a common exercise that painters have done for a very long time-- it's like practicing any creative skill-- you aren't *born* with talent, you've got to work and work and work at it to develop it, and the more you work at it, the better your work as a whole gets. You'll notice this especially if you've ever played an instrument-- if you stop playing for more than a few days, your chops disappear *fast.* Besides, it's kinda cool to do a riff on someone else's riff, to borrow a musical term.
rich.
Daria: He said master *painters.*